Content deleted Content added
Binksternet (talk | contribs) Reverted to revision 417735918 by Binksternet; rv troll. (TW) |
Lurielurie (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 585: | Line 585: | ||
:Bowman page 206, just like in the cite: [http://books.google.com/books?id=T4eIwWN2hwQC&pg=RA1-PA206&dq=%22Downtowner+John+Lurie+was+supposed+to+be%22&hl=en&ei=Gb91TcGfOYqksQOovJXMBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22Downtowner%20John%20Lurie%20was%20supposed%20to%20be%22&f=false "Downtowner John Lurie was supposed to be in the movie, but turned down a part after O'Brien asked Lurie's black girlfriend to make girlfriend to make them some pancakes."] |
:Bowman page 206, just like in the cite: [http://books.google.com/books?id=T4eIwWN2hwQC&pg=RA1-PA206&dq=%22Downtowner+John+Lurie+was+supposed+to+be%22&hl=en&ei=Gb91TcGfOYqksQOovJXMBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22Downtowner%20John%20Lurie%20was%20supposed%20to%20be%22&f=false "Downtowner John Lurie was supposed to be in the movie, but turned down a part after O'Brien asked Lurie's black girlfriend to make girlfriend to make them some pancakes."] |
||
:No need for personal attacks, man. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet#top|talk]]) 05:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC) |
:No need for personal attacks, man. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet#top|talk]]) 05:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
Since you have somehow removed my previous correspondence, I say again; I am not sure why you assume I am a man, nor how you can characterize anything I have said as personal attack since you say plainly above that you serve yourself. |
|||
Also, and again, your edits which reference Bowman are wildly inaccurate and reflect your bias, as do many of your other edits. |
|||
I repeat, you are in big trouble.[[User:Lurielurie|Lurielurie]] ([[User talk:Lurielurie|talk]]) 08:58, 8 March 2011 (UTC) |