The Thunderer (talk | contribs) →Disruptive editing: new section |
Black Kite (talk | contribs) →Disruptive editing: logged |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
You have been reported [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#User:BigDunc/ here] for your continued disruptive edits at [[Ulster Defence Regiment]]. [[User:The Thunderer|The Thunderer]] ([[User talk:The Thunderer|talk]]) 17:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC) |
You have been reported [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#User:BigDunc/ here] for your continued disruptive edits at [[Ulster Defence Regiment]]. [[User:The Thunderer|The Thunderer]] ([[User talk:The Thunderer|talk]]) 17:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Ulster Defence Regiment == |
|||
I am placing you under the terms of the Troubles Arbcom enforcement <i>on this article only</i> after examining your editing. I am then going to unprotect the article. |
|||
This means that you are limited to one revert on this article per week. Reversion of edits by anonymous IPs do not count as a revert. If you violate the terms of the probation, you may be blocked for an appropriate period of time. |
|||
Logged at [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/The_Troubles#Log_of_blocks, bans, and probations]]. <b>[[User talk:Black Kite|<font color="black">Black Kite</font>]]</b> 18:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:06, 2 September 2008
User:Steve Crossin/harassment-awareness SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.
|
|
Archives |
---|
Please
Dunc, please. As per my comments on Alison's page. Please stop all this aggression. I've read enough of your work to know you're a bloody good editor and despite the fact you and I have crossed swords on matters of opinion and policy I have no wish to see you like this. For the sake of your dignity and all that you stand for please don't let yourself be drawn into a slanging match. Unlike other people you appear to be a very intelligent person and reasonably civil. Don't do this anymore. This is an honest and abject appeal to you. I know you don't class me as a friend but I bear no grievance against you.The Thunderer (talk) 12:25, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
ChubmasterFat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism#ChubmasterFat The Thunderer (talk • contribs) 13:12, 23 August 2008 (UTC)The Thunderer (talk) 15:26, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- Interesting interlude that?The Thunderer (talk) 15:26, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Opinion
Dunc, if you're around at any time could you run your eye over this please? The Thunderer (talk) 05:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
UDR
It nearly happened again - we nearly finished up with two reflists.The Thunderer (talk) 18:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Great minds think alike LMAO. BigDuncTalk 18:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well that's one way of putting it but trying to keep up with the changes when three editors are at it is a little difficult. At least on this occasion I was able to stop before I made it look as if I was in the middle of an edit war. Did you look at The Troubles in Portadown yet?The Thunderer (talk) 18:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Cursory glance but would have similar opinion to User:Arch dude who commented on the talk page. BigDuncTalk 18:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- My answer would be the same however. Can you identify where the dubious synthesis is and I will try to eliminate it? I've read through it again and everything seems balanced to me.The Thunderer (talk) 18:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Cursory glance but would have similar opinion to User:Arch dude who commented on the talk page. BigDuncTalk 18:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well that's one way of putting it but trying to keep up with the changes when three editors are at it is a little difficult. At least on this occasion I was able to stop before I made it look as if I was in the middle of an edit war. Did you look at The Troubles in Portadown yet?The Thunderer (talk) 18:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
B Specials
Seeing your contribs at the UDR and the troubles in general, I was wondering if you could sort of help out at the USC article, seeing as it has become slanted by the user above. A newbie thanks Freedscouser (talk) 04:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with some of your edits at the USC article and appreciate your help in keeping it non-POV but there are obviously one or two issues. It's got to be kept non POV I totally agree but I don't think you should remove facts just because those facts themselves disagree with established POV on the subject. You're going to find the Unionist contingent coming in and trying to remove things they disagree with because it makes the force look bad, but your deletion of cited facts regarding Nationalist POV is not in keeping with the neutral policy. I need you to work with me on this article so that it remains balanced and I don't want the same interminable rows about it as have been going on over at UDR. Would you agree? The Thunderer (talk) 14:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- At this point I've done a fair bit more on the article but what is missing is more meat on the actual duties of the force. There are suggestions that the USC carried out "reprisal murders" and I have nothing on that. There is plenty of material at CAIN but it's largely (as far as I can see ) the result of various enquiries or statements by political figures of the day. I need to read more to understand more so I'll be look at the "Crowned Harp" as well as continuing to examine the "Thin Green Line" (the latter in my possession). May I suggest you try and find alternative sources so that Catholic, Protestant, NI Govt, UK Govt and Irish Govt sources can be included. Also any reports by outside agencies would be quite good, like human rights organisations. I don't mind reading the material and editing the information in if you don't mind coming up behind me to compare notes on the synthesis and POV. That's me done for now though, I've been at this solid for two weeks while I've been on holidays but I've run out of steam. The Thunderer (talk) 19:22, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- Requested quote supplied on article talk page. The Thunderer (talk) 18:56, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- At this point I've done a fair bit more on the article but what is missing is more meat on the actual duties of the force. There are suggestions that the USC carried out "reprisal murders" and I have nothing on that. There is plenty of material at CAIN but it's largely (as far as I can see ) the result of various enquiries or statements by political figures of the day. I need to read more to understand more so I'll be look at the "Crowned Harp" as well as continuing to examine the "Thin Green Line" (the latter in my possession). May I suggest you try and find alternative sources so that Catholic, Protestant, NI Govt, UK Govt and Irish Govt sources can be included. Also any reports by outside agencies would be quite good, like human rights organisations. I don't mind reading the material and editing the information in if you don't mind coming up behind me to compare notes on the synthesis and POV. That's me done for now though, I've been at this solid for two weeks while I've been on holidays but I've run out of steam. The Thunderer (talk) 19:22, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Ronald Bunting
Here is an article that I feel is well worth while expanding, if any info can be found. I vaguely remember his name being bandied about when I was very young, round about the time of Burntollet. My interest has been severely provoked by the fact that this (apparantly) rabid Loyalist, who went as far as to form his own vigilante group who were one of the key elements in the starting of the most recent troubles in Ireland, had a son who had totally opposite views to his father. Going so far as to join the Stickies and then INLA the guy finishes up getting done in by the UDA? We all know there were Proddies in the IRA but this has to be the story of the century with regards to them? The Thunderer (talk) 12:54, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Disruptive editing
You have been reported here for your continued disruptive edits at Ulster Defence Regiment. The Thunderer (talk) 17:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Ulster Defence Regiment
I am placing you under the terms of the Troubles Arbcom enforcement on this article only after examining your editing. I am then going to unprotect the article.
This means that you are limited to one revert on this article per week. Reversion of edits by anonymous IPs do not count as a revert. If you violate the terms of the probation, you may be blocked for an appropriate period of time.
Logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/The_Troubles#Log_of_blocks, bans, and probations. Black Kite 18:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)