Content deleted Content added
Ankitroy1997 (talk | contribs) →Question: Asked question. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
223.230.172.219 (talk) →Question: Added content. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
: {{Re|Ankitroy1997}} For the reasons stated in the edit summaries. Your stated reason for removal of degrees from the education parm of infoboxes is incorrect. The purpose of an infobox is to summarize important characteristics of the subject from the article. If the educational institution belongs in the infobox (which it does), leaving off the degree is leaving off half the story. It would be like leaving the date of a marriage off, or leaving off the place of birth while showing the date. The same applies to the dates that you removed from the Zuckerberg article.{{Pb}} Your intent here is obviously [[WP:NOTHERE|not to improve the project]], but instead to make a [[WP:POINT]], which is wrong on several levels. Several editors have been extremely patient with you. You're not fooling anyone by claiming to be a new editor{{Snd}} your behavior makes it clear. Please stop now. <span style="color:red">—[</span>[[User:AlanM1|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:green">Alan</span><span style="color:blue">M</span><span style="color:purple">1</span>]]([[User talk:AlanM1#top|talk]])<span style="color:red">]—</span> 14:18, 16 January 2020 (UTC) |
: {{Re|Ankitroy1997}} For the reasons stated in the edit summaries. Your stated reason for removal of degrees from the education parm of infoboxes is incorrect. The purpose of an infobox is to summarize important characteristics of the subject from the article. If the educational institution belongs in the infobox (which it does), leaving off the degree is leaving off half the story. It would be like leaving the date of a marriage off, or leaving off the place of birth while showing the date. The same applies to the dates that you removed from the Zuckerberg article.{{Pb}} Your intent here is obviously [[WP:NOTHERE|not to improve the project]], but instead to make a [[WP:POINT]], which is wrong on several levels. Several editors have been extremely patient with you. You're not fooling anyone by claiming to be a new editor{{Snd}} your behavior makes it clear. Please stop now. <span style="color:red">—[</span>[[User:AlanM1|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:green">Alan</span><span style="color:blue">M</span><span style="color:purple">1</span>]]([[User talk:AlanM1#top|talk]])<span style="color:red">]—</span> 14:18, 16 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
:::Fooling whom? What type of behaviour you are talking about and what to stop? I'm totally confused. Is there any reason behind targeting me personally?[[User:Ankitroy1997|Ankitroy1997]] ([[User talk:Ankitroy1997|talk]]) 16:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC) |
:::Fooling whom? What type of behaviour you are talking about and what to stop? I'm totally confused. Is there any reason behind targeting me personally?[[User:Ankitroy1997|Ankitroy1997]] ([[User talk:Ankitroy1997|talk]]) 16:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
==Sh*t== |
|||
:You are jealou* of Indian. You blo*dy idi*t fu*k off.[[Special:Contributions/223.230.172.219|223.230.172.219]] ([[User talk:223.230.172.219|talk]]) 20:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:20, 17 January 2020
imdb
When did it switch to being "editable by anyone" (see here)? I have been a member nearly 20 years and certain parts of it always have been this way.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:35, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Vchimpanzee: Not sure, really. I could be mis-remembering, but it seems like they used to be more reliable and became less so, maybe coincident with the changes where they moved some stuff to IMDBPro, added all the aggressive ad backgrounds and popups, etc. I think I remember submitting fixes that took forever to get approved (or never did) but now it seems like it's easy to get changes through (I forget what the structure is (whether it's reputation-based, or peer-review or what) because I don't bother any more – perhaps you can elaborate if you know). WT:RSN Archive 3 has pointers to discussions through 2010. WP:RSN Archive 1 is saying it was unreliable in 2007, so maybe it was always so, and cites to it were just not as well patrolled until more recently. {{IMDb warn}} was created in 2008. Heck, maybe I just mistakenly cited it myself until I knew better. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 00:04, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- I don't know much about imdb. I have reviewed close to 1000 movies and I have submitted trivia and asked for corrections. In some cases I had to make the corrections myself, which causes me to doubt the reliability. But there were certain parts of the site I assumed were always reliable because the information came from the companies. That changed when I was asked to submit the information for a movie that wasn't there and they made a mess of it because somehow I didn't do it right. But as I do here, I looked for sources that seemed reliable.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
I took the wifi back from him. Whatever that means. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Question
You reverted my edits which I did in Mark Zuckerberg, Mukesh Ambani and Jimmy Wales.Why?Ankitroy1997 (talk) 14:05, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Ankitroy1997: For the reasons stated in the edit summaries. Your stated reason for removal of degrees from the education parm of infoboxes is incorrect. The purpose of an infobox is to summarize important characteristics of the subject from the article. If the educational institution belongs in the infobox (which it does), leaving off the degree is leaving off half the story. It would be like leaving the date of a marriage off, or leaving off the place of birth while showing the date. The same applies to the dates that you removed from the Zuckerberg article. Your intent here is obviously not to improve the project, but instead to make a WP:POINT, which is wrong on several levels. Several editors have been extremely patient with you. You're not fooling anyone by claiming to be a new editor – your behavior makes it clear. Please stop now. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 14:18, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Fooling whom? What type of behaviour you are talking about and what to stop? I'm totally confused. Is there any reason behind targeting me personally?Ankitroy1997 (talk) 16:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Sh*t
- You are jealou* of Indian. You blo*dy idi*t fu*k off.223.230.172.219 (talk) 20:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)