Kimberly-Clark |
32.218.39.235 (talk) →Edit Warring at Kimberly-Clark: new section |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== [[Kimberly-Clark]] == |
== [[Kimberly-Clark]] == |
||
Please don't copy/paste. "Use your own words" Wikipedia takes copyright seriously. Thank you [[User:Jim1138|Jim1138]] ([[User talk:Jim1138|talk]]) 08:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC) |
Please don't copy/paste. "Use your own words" Wikipedia takes copyright seriously. Thank you [[User:Jim1138|Jim1138]] ([[User talk:Jim1138|talk]]) 08:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Edit Warring at [[Kimberly-Clark]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Kimberly-Clark]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[Wikipedia:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> |
|||
Please be particularly aware that [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Wikipedia's policy on edit warring]] states: |
|||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[Special:Contributions/32.218.39.235|32.218.39.235]] ([[User talk:32.218.39.235|talk]]) 09:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:02, 11 April 2017
Copyright violation at Kimberly-Clark
Your addition to Kimberly-Clark has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. 32.218.44.142 (talk) 16:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Here's what you keep doing. You highlight a bunch of text from Business Wire, copy it, paste it here, and make no substantial changes to the text. That's plagiarism whether or not the press release you're stealing from is copyrighted. I don't know if you can't or won't write your own prose but since the lawsuit information is important, you're damaging that article by using a tactic that will never work. CityOfSilver 03:23, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps you do not understand copyright infringement.... but your argument that something is plagiarized is nonsense, as reporting a press release is perfectly acceptable. Please show me where it is not acceptable to do so.
Please don't copy/paste. "Use your own words" Wikipedia takes copyright seriously. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Edit Warring at Kimberly-Clark
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/30px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kimberly-Clark. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 32.218.39.235 (talk) 09:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)