71.111.115.155 (talk) No edit summary |
71.111.115.155 (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Richards&diff=89118914&oldid=89118588] |
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Richards&diff=89118914&oldid=89118588] |
||
At one point or another all of those edits were shot down and I have struggled to reinstate them. |
At one point or another all of those edits were shot down and I have struggled to reinstate them. |
||
The only reason you've been targetted is due to your calling me a "racist" and "racist [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANetscott%2FArchive-05&diff=89314203&oldid=89313943 KKK]" [member] after I removed your inapproriate |
The only reason you've been targetted is due to your calling me a "racist" and "racist [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANetscott%2FArchive-05&diff=89314203&oldid=89313943 KKK]" [member] after I removed your inapproriate comments from [[Talk:Michael Richards]]. Nice... Ultimately, others saw what my edits and interactions with you were about and have agreed with them accordingly. '' ''([[User_talk:Netscott|→]][[User:Netscott|<span style='background: white; color: grey'>Netscott</span>]])'' 20:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
::Here's where I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Richards&diff=89122865&oldid=89122477 introduced the lynching aspect] into the article. ''([[User_talk:Netscott|→]][[User:Netscott|<span style='background: white; color: grey'>Netscott</span>]])'' 20:04, 23 November 2006 (UTC) |
::Here's where I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Richards&diff=89122865&oldid=89122477 introduced the lynching aspect] into the article. ''([[User_talk:Netscott|→]][[User:Netscott|<span style='background: white; color: grey'>Netscott</span>]])'' 20:04, 23 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 21:35, 23 November 2006
71.111.115.155 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Admin Glen S inaccurately and w/o due process accuses me of being a sock puppet or something.Please help this Newbie! There are many people/ Wikipedians in Oregon and these addreses are from 2 different cities way apart! Very unfair Long Term Block and unjustified. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Admin Glen S inaccurately and w/o due process accuses me of being a sock puppet or something.Please help this Newbie! There are many people/ Wikipedians in Oregon and these addreses are from 2 different cities way apart! Very unfair Long Term Block and unjustified. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Admin Glen S inaccurately and w/o due process accuses me of being a sock puppet or something.Please help this Newbie! There are many people/ Wikipedians in Oregon and these addreses are from 2 different cities way apart! Very unfair Long Term Block and unjustified. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
_TOC__
Welcome!
Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.
Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 71.111.115.155). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in.
When you edit pages:
- Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
- Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to .
- Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.
The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on my talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia.
Stop misusing talk pages
Anon, stop using the Talk:Michael Richards page against Wikipedia guidelines. Additionally when you refer to Wikipedia adminstrators as a bunch of "white guys" you're contravening Wikipedia:Civility. If you continue you will once again be blocked. (→Netscott) 15:36, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Now your just making things up. I don't know what your talking about but you should be blocked for harassment! I haven't done anything and you keep posting my ISP info!
- There's no evidence I WROTE that I only reverted your deletion of it. People are entitle to their views! Stop your harrassment!
WE SHALL OVERCOME BROTHERS AND SISTERS
That user also wrote "Power to the People!" you have problem with that NetScott?? Your actions are highly abusive and totalitarian to say the least.
MY PEOPLE HAVE OVERCOME APARTHEID, HANGINGS, segregation, Attack Dogs, WaterHoses, and RedNeck Sheriffs. We are not going to be Cowered and SCARED by the likes of NETSCOTT User_talk:Netscott and Michael Richards and the David Dukes of this world!
WE SHALL OVERCOME!!!
- You know you really should review my edits of the Michael Richards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) article and then see if perhaps you've got me wrong. You'll not find edits where I've tried to downplay or otherwise whitewash the man. In fact my edits have been quite the opposite. I was the editor who introduced the whole lynching in the United States aspect of his commentary and I've struggled to keep that in the article (among other things). I won't post anymore on your talk pages as I can imagine that my doing so will be misconstrued as harassment but honestly you've got things all wrong. (→Netscott) 19:19, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- How come you keep your intimidating posting my ISP addresss and conspiring to get me Blocked??
Trying to Shut a Brother up it looks to me. Same with this Glen S guy. Whats with his power trip? I guess New Zealand doesn't have many "Uppitty" Blacks. Some body unblock me PLEASE!
- Do these look like the edits of a racist?
At one point or another all of those edits were shot down and I have struggled to reinstate them. The only reason you've been targetted is due to your calling me a "racist" and "racist KKK" [member] after I removed your inapproriate comments from Talk:Michael Richards. Nice... Ultimately, others saw what my edits and interactions with you were about and have agreed with them accordingly. (→Netscott) 20:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Here's where I introduced the lynching aspect into the article. (→Netscott) 20:04, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Reply
- You keep with those falsehoods I don't know who wrote that stuff about You. It was a totally DIFFERENT IP Address from a Different CITY in case you and that Glen S. didn't see! For All I know you wrote it yourself since it was on Your USERPAGE. Stop Blaming Minorities for all your Problems! Your just a KKKramer Keeping a Brother Down!!
You also broke your promise NOT to post here anymore! Just Like your Promises to the Native Indians!
THE TRUTH
And how come you Keep REVERTING the relevant stuff I put on the Michael Richards talk page? Huh?? TRying to Shut a Brother Up! I would think Wiki would want MORE diversity in its Editors but maybe I'm wrong.
Privacy concerns
Please create an account and such easily accessable IP information about you will not be readily available. (→Netscott) 15:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Also, read Wikipedia:Why create an account? (→Netscott) 15:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Please Stop your harassment and falsehoods!!
- As a courtesy for other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion).For further info see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. (→Netscott) 16:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- As long as you cease misuing talk pages and contravening WP:CIV there won't be any problems. Know that your IP information is readily available via the [IPinfo] link on lower left part of this talk page. (→Netscott) 16:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
71.111.115.155 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Admin Glen S inaccurately and w/o due process accuses me of being a sock puppet or something.Please help this Newbie! There are many people/ Wikipedians in Oregon and these addreses are from 2 different cities way apart! Very unfair Long Term Block and unjustified. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Admin Glen S inaccurately and w/o due process accuses me of being a sock puppet or something.Please help this Newbie! There are many people/ Wikipedians in Oregon and these addreses are from 2 different cities way apart! Very unfair Long Term Block and unjustified. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Admin Glen S inaccurately and w/o due process accuses me of being a sock puppet or something.Please help this Newbie! There are many people/ Wikipedians in Oregon and these addreses are from 2 different cities way apart! Very unfair Long Term Block and unjustified. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}