Andy Dingley (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Andy Dingley (talk | contribs) Nanuet, New York |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your '''last warning'''; the next time you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Steampunk]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 -->[[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 15:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC) |
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your '''last warning'''; the next time you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Steampunk]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 -->[[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 15:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Edit warring at [[Nanuet, New York]] == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not add commentary or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles, as you did to [[Nanuet, New York]]. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Nanuet, New York]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:TALKDONTREVERT|collaborate]] with others and avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]].<br> |
|||
In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that: |
|||
# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.''' |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you continue to edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> |
|||
Thanks for adding this, but it needs some support for external sources (see [[WP:RS]]) if it's to be added. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 13:11, 20 April 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:11, 20 April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Steampunk appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.Andy Dingley (talk) 09:41, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Steampunk, you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Nanuet, New York, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Steampunk, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Edit warring at Nanuet, New York
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nanuet, New York. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nanuet, New York. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Thanks for adding this, but it needs some support for external sources (see WP:RS) if it's to be added. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:11, 20 April 2011 (UTC)