→September 2008: +2 more NORs |
→September 2008: 3rr for Buffy Summers |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. <br> The next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research policy]] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article{{#if:Xander Harris|, as you did to [[:Xander Harris]]}}, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 22:35, 3 September 2008 (UTC) |
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. <br> The next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research policy]] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article{{#if:Xander Harris|, as you did to [[:Xander Harris]]}}, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 22:35, 3 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Buffy Summers|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Buffy Summers]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 22:47, 3 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:47, 3 September 2008
Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (24.93.236.98) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Terraxos (talk) 02:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
July 2008
On the recent edit you made you used the word "awesome". When your writing, as a general rule, try to refrain from adding such personal excitememtn in what you writing (although it's perfectly fine to be excited about what you writing).
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Scooby Gang has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 03:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Courage the Cowardly Dog characters. The material therein was removed because it consisted of unencyclopedic in-universe cruft, and there was no reason to repost it. Beemer69 chitchat 05:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent contributions to the Ganon article. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we cannot accept sources which appear to be the original work of the editor. If the material you added can be attributed to a reliable source, you may add it back if you cite it. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in the verifiability of the article. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:41, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Lois Griffin constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 22:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of characters in Courage the Cowardly Dog. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ScarianCall me Pat! 23:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Buffy
The reason the categories are being removed is because the "Slayer" category takes care of them. Being a "Slayer" automatically puts on in all those categories, so we don't have to list them. Being a "Valley Girl" automatically puts in in the category of being "from California", so we don't need that one. "Anne" is not something the character is known by. It is a meaningless, trivial facts about the character (yes, I'm aware that she went by that name when she waitressed, but that isn't quite the same as being known as "Buffy Anne Summers"). Fictional characters are neither "alive" nor "dead", they are fictional and when they are "killed off" they can easily be brough back to life in the fictional world that they live in. I think there other issues with the powers and such were because in the past those were subjective abilities that were never concrete. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 20:48, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- I have explained why we are not using those categories. If you disagree, then please start a discussion on the talk page. If you continue to add them back, and refuse to discuss this, then I will have to assume you are merely being disruptive. In such case, I will be forced to report you to an Administrator. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 17:00, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Please do not add excessive categories to Buffy the Vampire Slayer characters. While a certain amount of category overlap is inevitable, you have been adding categories that have multiple issues:
- Categories that are subsumed by another category. For example, Spike is a fictional person from London but every fictional person from London is also a fictional English person. In that case, ONLY use the most specific category.
- Categories that are solely characteristics of another category. All Buffyverse Vampires are undead, immortals, murderers, martial artists, and have superhuman strength. All vampire hunters are vigilantes.
- Original research. Spike is not described by any reliable source as a Karateka, rapist ("Seeing Red" was an attempted rape), or superhero.
- Inconsequential traits. Spike gambles, and is over a century old, but these are not defining characteristics of who he is. These sorts of changes are the most open to interpretation, and should be discussed on the talk page.
- I will be reverting reinsertions of these without comment if you continue to readd them. Jclemens (talk) 19:55, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Please do not add excessive categories to Buffy the Vampire Slayer characters. While a certain amount of category overlap is inevitable, you have been adding categories that have multiple issues:
September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Willow Rosenburg, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Jclemens (talk) 17:06, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Rupert Giles, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Jclemens (talk) 17:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Angel (Buffy the Vampire Slayer). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jclemens (talk) 17:13, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Spike (Buffy the Vampire Slayer). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Jclemens (talk) 17:19, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Angel (Buffy the Vampire Slayer), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jclemens (talk) 23:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Oz (Buffy the Vampire Slayer), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jclemens (talk) 23:54, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Angel (Buffy the Vampire Slayer). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Jclemens (talk) 00:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dawn Summers. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Jclemens (talk) 00:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rupert Giles. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Jclemens (talk) 00:20, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Consider this block as a last warning. If your disruptive noncooperative editing continue you would have longer blocks Alex Bakharev (talk) 02:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Buffy Summers, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jclemens (talk) 22:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Willow Rosenburg, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jclemens (talk) 22:35, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Xander Harris, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jclemens (talk) 22:35, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Buffy Summers. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Jclemens (talk) 22:47, 3 September 2008 (UTC)