GraziePrego (talk | contribs) →Same as above: new section Tag: New topic |
TarnishedPath (talk | contribs) Warning: Edit warring on National Socialist Network. Tag: Twinkle |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Any justification for reverting me? I see @[[User:AndreyKva|AndreyKva]] has already mentioned this. There's no justification for removing that section, why do you keep removing it? It's fully sourced. [[User:GraziePrego|GraziePrego]] ([[User talk:GraziePrego|talk]]) 06:16, 8 December 2023 (UTC) |
Any justification for reverting me? I see @[[User:AndreyKva|AndreyKva]] has already mentioned this. There's no justification for removing that section, why do you keep removing it? It's fully sourced. [[User:GraziePrego|GraziePrego]] ([[User talk:GraziePrego|talk]]) 06:16, 8 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
== December 2023 == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[WP:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:National Socialist Network]]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#In talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[WP:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[WP:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. |
|||
Points to note: |
|||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[WP:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to [[WP:Requests for page protection|request temporary page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.''' ''Thinking you are right is not a reason to engage in edit warring. With edits [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Socialist_Network&diff=1188858570&oldid=1188851241], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Socialist_Network&diff=1188873737&oldid=1188862950] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Socialist_Network&diff=1188875336&oldid=1188874130] you have reverted the article three times within a 24 hour period. If you revert one more time within the 24 hour period you will be in violation of [[WP:3RR]].''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:TarnishedPath|''TarnishedPath'']]<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|talk]]</sup> 11:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
{{Block indent|''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself or [[Special:UserLogin|logging in with an existing account]] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
Revision as of 11:37, 8 December 2023
Thornbury attack
Before reverting the page again, please see Talk:National Socialist Network. - AndreyKva (talk) 03:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Same as above
Any justification for reverting me? I see @AndreyKva has already mentioned this. There's no justification for removing that section, why do you keep removing it? It's fully sourced. GraziePrego (talk) 06:16, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on National Socialist Network. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Thinking you are right is not a reason to engage in edit warring. With edits [1], [2] and [3] you have reverted the article three times within a 24 hour period. If you revert one more time within the 24 hour period you will be in violation of WP:3RR. TarnishedPathtalk 11:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)