BD2412 to me you have proven to edit Wikipedia in an argumentative, belittling and tendentious way and now add selective reference and I ask you to please consider your approach.
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You truly keep Wikipedia moving in positive directions. [[User:Gregkaye|Gregkaye]] ([[User talk:Gregkaye|talk]]) 16:07, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You truly keep Wikipedia moving in positive directions. [[User:Gregkaye|Gregkaye]] ([[User talk:Gregkaye|talk]]) 16:07, 3 September 2014 (UTC)<br /><small>I guess this was before I saw what I regard to be your tactics of tendentious, skewed argument and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Disambiguation&diff=661268919&oldid=661268359 selective reference.] [[User:GregKaye|Greg]][[User talk:GregKaye|Kaye]] 07:49, 9 May 2015 (UTC)</small>
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BD2412.
I have edited about 10% of the articles on Wikipedia; if you have edited more than ten articles, there is probably an article that both you and I have edited.
Wikipedia is not an experiment in democracy: its primary method of finding consensus is discussion, not voting. That is, majority opinion does not necessarily rule in Wikipedia. Various votes are regularly conducted, but their numerical results are usually only one of several means of making a decision. The discussions that accompany the voting processes are crucial means of reaching consensus.
Yes, I am a lawyer. No, I am not giving you legal advice.
I agree to multi-license all my text, image, and design contributions, including my user pages, as described below:
Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.
Minor edits multi-licensed into the public domain
I agree to multi-license my eligible text contributions marked as minor edits, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and into the public domain. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my minor edit contributions in the public domain, please check the multi-licensing guide.
Licensing rights granted to Wikimedia Foundation
I grant non-exclusive permission for the Wikimedia Foundation Inc. to relicense my text contributions under any copyleft license that it chooses, provided it maintains the free and open spirit of the GFDL. This permission acknowledges that future licensing needs of the Wikimedia projects may need adapting in unforeseen fashions to facilitate other uses, formats, and locations. It is given for as long as this banner remains.
The Guidance Barnstar
You truly keep Wikipedia moving in positive directions. Gregkaye (talk) 16:07, 3 September 2014 (UTC) I guess this was before I saw what I regard to be your tactics of tendentious, skewed argument and selective reference.GregKaye 07:49, 9 May 2015 (UTC)