TreasuryTag (talk | contribs) |
DrPatrickSpiller (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Yes but when a review of the episode confirms this, it's hardly lying is it? Also can't you accept the BBC press office for Cold Blood as confirmation of a 50 minute running time? The time's were confirmed today and for me, 7-7:50 = 50 minutes. ETA: Also why delete a synopsis given from the BBC Press Office for Cold Blood, you surely cannot consider that not reliable. --[[User:DrPatrickSpiller|DrPatrickSpiller]] ([[User talk:DrPatrickSpiller|talk]]) 18:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC) |
Yes but when a review of the episode confirms this, it's hardly lying is it? Also can't you accept the BBC press office for Cold Blood as confirmation of a 50 minute running time? The time's were confirmed today and for me, 7-7:50 = 50 minutes. ETA: Also why delete a synopsis given from the BBC Press Office for Cold Blood, you surely cannot consider that not reliable. --[[User:DrPatrickSpiller|DrPatrickSpiller]] ([[User talk:DrPatrickSpiller|talk]]) 18:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
:No, just a copyright violation to use it verbatim. It's also not in encyclopedic style. Please stop. <font color="#00ACF4">╟─[[User:TreasuryTag|Treasury]][[User talk:TreasuryTag|Tag]]►[[Special:Contributions/TreasuryTag|<span style="cursor:help;">voice vote</span>]]─╢</font> 18:48, 19 May 2010 (UTC) |
:No, just a copyright violation to use it verbatim. It's also not in encyclopedic style. Please stop. <font color="#00ACF4">╟─[[User:TreasuryTag|Treasury]][[User talk:TreasuryTag|Tag]]►[[Special:Contributions/TreasuryTag|<span style="cursor:help;">voice vote</span>]]─╢</font> 18:48, 19 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
I've seen it used on countless articles without deletion, the press office synopses are free to use, that's what they're there for. --[[User:DrPatrickSpiller|DrPatrickSpiller]] ([[User talk:DrPatrickSpiller|talk]]) 18:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:49, 19 May 2010
![]() | Doctor Who Unassessed Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
Edits to The Hungry Earth/Cold Blood
I have made a number of accurate changes which keep being changed back, despite referencing and links to verify my changes. They are correct, honestly. A review of the episode confirms the setting as 2020, the 2015 of the previews was a mistake. And the BBC Press Office lists Cold Blood as 7:00-7:50, therefore 50 minutes long. --DrPatrickSpiller (talk) 18:40, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- Until the official BBC site changes, or the episode airs, we assume that the BBC are accurate..cause you know, they made the show. magnius (talk) 18:41, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Yes but when a review of the episode confirms this, it's hardly lying is it? Also can't you accept the BBC press office for Cold Blood as confirmation of a 50 minute running time? The time's were confirmed today and for me, 7-7:50 = 50 minutes. ETA: Also why delete a synopsis given from the BBC Press Office for Cold Blood, you surely cannot consider that not reliable. --DrPatrickSpiller (talk) 18:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- No, just a copyright violation to use it verbatim. It's also not in encyclopedic style. Please stop. ╟─TreasuryTag►voice vote─╢ 18:48, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
I've seen it used on countless articles without deletion, the press office synopses are free to use, that's what they're there for. --DrPatrickSpiller (talk) 18:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)