Content deleted Content added
WeatherWriter (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Hey {{ping|Tony1}}, why do you say it is not a proper name? The book has it fully capitalized. This is similar to the [[Enhanced Fujita scale]] (2-word proper name) or the [[International Fujita scale]] (2-word proper name) or the [[Saffir–Simpson scale]]. The outbreak names are even capitalized (Example being [https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/130/6/1520-0493_2002_130_1633_anlats_2.0.co_2.xml this academically published] paper saying "Super Outbreak" (capitalized). "Outbreak Intensity Score" is the proper name for the new scale and ranking categories. I will revert the good-faith move, but you need to provide examples of why it would not be proper names if you still believe it is not a proper name. '''The [[User:WeatherWriter|Weather Event Writer]]''' ([[User talk:WeatherWriter|Talk Page)]] 00:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC) |
Hey {{ping|Tony1}}, why do you say it is not a proper name? The book has it fully capitalized. This is similar to the [[Enhanced Fujita scale]] (2-word proper name) or the [[International Fujita scale]] (2-word proper name) or the [[Saffir–Simpson scale]]. The outbreak names are even capitalized (Example being [https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/130/6/1520-0493_2002_130_1633_anlats_2.0.co_2.xml this academically published] paper saying "Super Outbreak" (capitalized). "Outbreak Intensity Score" is the proper name for the new scale and ranking categories. I will revert the good-faith move, but you need to provide examples of why it would not be proper names if you still believe it is not a proper name. '''The [[User:WeatherWriter|Weather Event Writer]]''' ([[User talk:WeatherWriter|Talk Page)]] 00:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
:Also, it isn't just the "title" of the paper either. Read the abstract: "The second major squall line within the Super Outbreak storm". It is capitalized and considered a proper name/term. '''The [[User:WeatherWriter|Weather Event Writer]]''' ([[User talk:WeatherWriter|Talk Page)]] 00:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC) |
:Also, it isn't just the "title" of the paper either. Read the abstract: "The second major squall line within the Super Outbreak storm". It is capitalized and considered a proper name/term. '''The [[User:WeatherWriter|Weather Event Writer]]''' ([[User talk:WeatherWriter|Talk Page)]] 00:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Before I respond, I'm waiting for you to reverse your vandalism: DOWNCASE THE HEADINGS, per WP's hard-and-fast policy. NOW please, since my work in fixing that has twice been ruined. [[User:Tony1|<b style="color:darkgreen">Tony</b>]] [[User talk:Tony1|<span style="color:darkgreen">(talk)</span>]] 00:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:12, 1 April 2024
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proper name
Hey @Tony1:, why do you say it is not a proper name? The book has it fully capitalized. This is similar to the Enhanced Fujita scale (2-word proper name) or the International Fujita scale (2-word proper name) or the Saffir–Simpson scale. The outbreak names are even capitalized (Example being this academically published paper saying "Super Outbreak" (capitalized). "Outbreak Intensity Score" is the proper name for the new scale and ranking categories. I will revert the good-faith move, but you need to provide examples of why it would not be proper names if you still believe it is not a proper name. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 00:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also, it isn't just the "title" of the paper either. Read the abstract: "The second major squall line within the Super Outbreak storm". It is capitalized and considered a proper name/term. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 00:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)