Jason Palpatine (talk | contribs) |
All of the single episodes that those lists have are indeed crap. |
||
Line 294: | Line 294: | ||
::Crap? Your concept of [[crap]] leaves much to be desired. Of course, one person's gold ''is'' another person's crap, I guess. But, I would like to know ''why'' the articles relating to [[Ben 10]] have been targeted? Are you actually saying that everything that branches from the [[:Category:Lists of science fiction television series episodes]] is actually only crap? -- [[User:Jason Palpatine|Jason Palpatine]] 14:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC) <small> ''This User wishes (but too often fails) understanding of Wikipedia's systematized logistical projection of its balanced policy contingency.'' </small> ([[user_talk:Jason Palpatine|speak your mind]] | [[Special:contributions/Jason Palpatine|contributions]]) |
::Crap? Your concept of [[crap]] leaves much to be desired. Of course, one person's gold ''is'' another person's crap, I guess. But, I would like to know ''why'' the articles relating to [[Ben 10]] have been targeted? Are you actually saying that everything that branches from the [[:Category:Lists of science fiction television series episodes]] is actually only crap? -- [[User:Jason Palpatine|Jason Palpatine]] 14:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC) <small> ''This User wishes (but too often fails) understanding of Wikipedia's systematized logistical projection of its balanced policy contingency.'' </small> ([[user_talk:Jason Palpatine|speak your mind]] | [[Special:contributions/Jason Palpatine|contributions]]) |
||
:::All of the single episodes that those lists have are indeed crap. Less then 100 of the (tens of?) thousands of episode articles on this site actually need articles. This was singled out because I just happened to choose the category when looking for episodes to cut. I don't have an agenda or anything. [[User:TTN|Nemu]] 17:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Limax Episode Notes/Goofs == |
== Limax Episode Notes/Goofs == |
||
Revision as of 17:11, 1 May 2007
Making episode recap pages
Please wait until the day an episode airs to make a recap page for it. Otherwise, the page will simply be deleted shortly after its creation. - Someguy0830 23:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
- OK. I'll wait. Thanks someguy. Arukun14 07:37, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Kevin 11 is now ready for editing. Please do not vandalize. Arukun14 08:43, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- I won't be able to watch the episode for another few hours, so there's only a basic recap up. It's accuracy is suspect, since I basically gathered it from various spoilers. - Someguy0830 (Talk) 23:01, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Redesign
The article has been redesigned with a new layout. Arukun14 14:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- Looks better now, but it invalidated all the specific section links in the main article. They've been removed. - Someguy0830 03:06, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Infoboxes for each individual episode look nice and exhibits a lot of information about the specific episode. Not a bad idea. Arukun14 02:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- It'd be better if they were real infoboxes. Have to find the form for making one. - Someguy0830 (Talk) 02:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- And now that's done. The template is here: Template:Infobox Ben 10 episode. - Someguy0830 (Talk) 04:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Re-designed the table again to re-enable the ability to link from other sites. Arukun14 03:51, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Modified it slightly. Couldn't figure out what the point of the border code was for. Removing it made it look nicer. - Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 04:02, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Who removed the link on the Gwen 10 episode saying that it was based on the Marvel "What If" series? It draws obvious references and was a bit informative. --Sailormarcus 02:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Re-do
Why is it that almost every villain from the first season makes an apearence in the second season?
The shows should be added
I think wiki should add the ben10 eposodes here incase you missed it on TV.
- No. That's a copyright violation. If you want to download the episodes, do as others do and take the time and effort to track them down. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 23:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Ghost Freak out
Can any one tell me about the eposoid I only saw the last 5 min. of it
- you have to read the short summary, because we cant give you a full summary on the episode here. that makes no sense. Besides, Wikipedia is not a Summary about episodes, if you want that, go to TV.com and find a summary on Ghost Freaked out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thunder The Hedgehog (talk • contribs).
Who The Hell....
Who is the freaking persion that did this: Ghostfreaked out? That isin how it is supposed to be! it is supoosed to be Ghost Freaked out. If i Find the person who did that i will kill them--Dark Duelist 5000 16:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Don't make stupid threats. It only shows that you're not intelligent enough to back up your statements. It's one word as rendered in the episode. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 19:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- I WATCHED THAT EPISODE, AND I AM TELLING YOU, IT IS GHOST FREAKED OUT! I WATCHED THE EPISODE. THE EPISODE! ANd I HAVE AN INTELLIGANCE NEAR 190.--Dark Duelist 5000 15:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sure aren't showing it with your yelling. You obviously didn't watch the episode, because it's rendered as one word. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 20:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- I watched the episode, and it is Two words not one word. You are getting on my patenice. it is Ghost Freaked Out, now, just, please leave it like that or else my Dark side might come out. i agree with Dark Duelist 5000. It is Ghost Freaked Out.--71.252.91.153 22:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Again, don't make stupid threats. And again, you obviously lack the ability to pay attention. Click here. See that image? One word. Quit being ignorant and leave the title be. Also, don't try to play the sockpuppet game with IP addresses. You're obviously the same person. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 22:53, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, I will leave it. I Know that it is one word now. Im sorry for all the trouble i caused. But here is one thing i dont get. It says Ghostfreaked out, but cable says Ghost Freaked Out. Could you answer that please? Oh, and that wasnt me. That was my brother.--Dark Duelist 5000 16:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Cable makes mistakes, as do all TV Guides. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 19:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Once We get information about the Third and fourth season, do we create a Box for it?, because all i know is that there will be another Episode when Ben Finds a new alien named Electric Bolt, and an episode in which the orginial aliens inside the omnitrix, the ones lurking somewhere in the universe, attack ben because their DNa was imprisioned in the Omnitrix. I Dont know the names, but the second one is, Aliens Freaked Out -- 15:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- No only ectonurites would get mad because ectonurite's personality is found in just a few strands of DNa IcyLizard49
- I Know that, that is why i put that informaton. But, Then The other one is Electrical Freaking Out... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.252.33.14 (talk • contribs) .
Big Tick
What? In Big Tick for ghostfreaks attack on the big tick you see his back and you can tell that he is showing the big tick his true form Djf2014 15:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- No, those were his tentacles from Last Laugh. look at a rerun and look more closly, bec Not even ben knew about ghostfreak's true form, and that was his front, period.Dark Duelist 5000 15:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Gwen 10 similarity to Hitchhiker series
One thing I noticed about the "Gwen 10" episode was the similarity to the theme of multiversal displacement in Mostly Harmless. I'm not really sure if this is an actual similarity or if it's just coincidental and there's no real evidence. Anyone have any thoughts?
- Some Hichhiker: NO
Back with a Vengeance Summary
Who the heck wrote the summary for that episode? You shouldn't post your own opinions in an encyclopedia. Could someone give it an actual summary? I'd do it but there are propably hundreds out there who could do it better.
- It's just vandalism. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 21:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Season 3 Episodes
It says in the season 3 section that the only known episodes in season 3 are "Master of Electricity" and "Here Comes Upchuck", is this just vandalism or did they just not put up a referenece?
Reference, and there are known four known episodes now.
Well, could someone put up a reference?
An article for every episode?
Does this seem unnecessary to anyone else? The show's of no special significance- not to insult it, I simply think that this article alone is enough. As I believe has been mentioned before, Wikipedia isn't really the place for complete episode recaps- these would be more appropriate on a site like TV.com. --Tozoku 21:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Plenty of precedent. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 21:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Plenty of shows have an entry per episode. You should take this up with WikiProject Television and see what response you get. Pacific Coast Highway {Gobble Gobble! • Happy Thanksgiving! • WP:NYCS} 22:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Episode screenshots
I've created appropriate screenshots for each individual episode. I hope they are OK. Arukun14 06:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Naruto in Ben 10
Did anyone else notice the almost scary resemblance of the 3 grandchildren at the end of the Christmas episode to Konohamaru, Moegi, and Udon from Naruto? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konohamaru —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.91.155.164 (talk) 00:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC).
I noticed. I understand the reference, but why did they put that in? Is there some relationship between Ben 10 and Naruto?
Who...
Who changed the old layout to this one?The old one was WAY better.84.195.156.68 20:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- It was the Wiki wizard, a wonderful mage who goes from page to page standardizing layouts. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
It seemed like vandalism, due to the fact that it had about 8 links to a page that had nothing to do with Ben 10, and made no sense. I reverted it due to that. Zyborg Whatevers the reason, it doesnt seem like the "wiki wizard" did it. :/ I mostly agree with Zyborg.84.195.156.68 17:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Season 4?
Where did this information come from? Sorry for the shortness of this message. Zyborg
- Confirmation of a new season came from one of the voice actors for the show. However, I'm finding no sources for the types of aliens being introduced. I'm adding a cite tag to it. -- Jelly Soup 10:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Production code 302
Ben 10,000 is listed as 302 here, but in it's article it is listed as 301. Midnight Madness is listed as 301 here and in it's article. Witch one is is 301? I guessing it's Midnight Madness as it's not uncommon for episodes to be aired out of order, but I don't want to change something on a hunch. Where are the production codes found anyway? --Bobby D. DS. 19:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Ben 10000 takes place before Midnight madness, but Midnight madness was on TV before Ben 10000. Maybe they just made Midnight madness first, and that is why the production code is before Ben 10000?
Main Villian for season 4?
Who do you think will be the next main villian for season 4? Superlogan7437 23:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC) (spoilers ahead) i went to canada where it is showing
- Xylene will be a villain, Dr Animo will be a villain, Hamsterman is a villain and the AA Megawhatt will be a villain.
- Xylene will want to dissolve the earth
- Dr animo does his usual tricks
- Hamsterman wants to steal Vilgax's robots
- AA Megawhatt is the leader of the megawhatts and he wants to release the ones ben trapped in Torist trap. That is how ben gets the megawhatt dna. He names it Electrowatt.
I saw 4 of the episodes:
- Upchucking - Xylene goes to dissolve the world
- The Transmodulator returns - Animo is back
- Rodent - Hamsterman goes to steal the robots
- Mega what? - AA megawhatt comes.
- Weird... I never seen a network release an episode in the next season in Canada before it airs in the US... Did you actually watch these episodes? --PostScript (info/talk/contribs) 14:31, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- He's lying. No such thing has been said. Xylene is a good guy (gal) at that. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 15:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Excuse Me, what I meant was who would be the main villian for season 4. such as Vilgax for season 1 , Kevin 11 for season 2, and Ghostfreak for season 3. I predict the Forever Knights will be involved. Superlogan7437 23:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- No, we were talking about the comments below your comment, the one that starts with "(spoilers ahead) i went [...]", not yours, Superlogan7437. By the way, just to remind you, (I'm really sorry if I seem snobyish in the following sentences, I don't mean to) Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views.--PostScript (info/talk/contribs) 21:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Citation
Yes, yes, Megan stated that there will be a fourth season. HOWEVER, I see nothing on the posted link (or anywhere else on the internet short of this article) that states there will be mole, angel or pirate aliens. THAT is what is being marked for citation. -- Jelly Soup 01:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't revert cause of that. There was a revert war over an image. Pacific Coast Highway {talk • contribs} 01:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- I wasn't pointing fingers. I just didn't want there to be any confusion over what was being cited. Sorry if it seemed otherwise. -- Jelly Soup 01:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Removed it entirely. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- It seemed that way from your edit summary, but ok. Pacific Coast Highway {talk • contribs} 01:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Felt I should mention it anyway. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- No, that was directed at Jelly Soup. Not towards you. Pacific Coast Highway {talk • contribs} 01:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Regardless, problem solved. Good game. -- Jelly Soup 02:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Stolen Image
Ignoring the fact that it's a screenshot from an episode that has already aired, what is the damn problem? Taking a look at the history, it seems that some random user said "My image, lol!" without linking to a source or showing any proof. Thoughts? -- 69.233.222.102 03:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- If I don't see some proof as to the 'ownership' of the image in question, I'm going to readd it. Removal will result in me calling for mediation. -- Jelly Soup 08:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- It seems the image in question is from ben10toys.net. While the image is still just a screenshot, I guess it is their image. -- Jelly Soup 04:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Season 4 Aliens
Somebody put that there would be 4 new aliens in Season 4: a Megawhatt, an angel, a digging thing, and a pirate-themed alien. I think that may have just been vandalism (especially the pirate thing), but if not, why was it deleted? Dodo man 1 20:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)dodo_man_1 16:56, 18 April 2007
- The information could not be verified. An internet search brought up nothing but links to this article, and wikipedia can't be it's own source. -- Jelly Soup 04:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Is there a need for the single episodes?
Redirected articles:
Besides a few of the first season episodes, the plot summaries here seem quite adequate. Seeing as this is a simple cartoon, I see little chance of any sourced information besides a single plot summary for each episode. Does anyone care if I redirect them? Nemu 19:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Nope. Go ahead. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 19:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- OK, before I start, is there anyone that works on these articles regularly that will likely blindly revert the redirects for no real reason besides "they're important"? There isn't much of a point if I have to do it twice. Nemu 19:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Not anyone I'd know off-hand, though I wouldn't be surprised if someone did it. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 19:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- OK, that's done. I'll update the double redirects after I eat. Nemu 19:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Good idea, hopefully they remain as redirects. The episode articles were just crap, as many were huge plot guides. RobJ1981 20:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Offhand -- ME! I have not done much editing of the Ben 10 articles, but blanking the the whole lot by changing them all to redirects to the listing article is a bit extream. In point of fact I at first I thought I had been mistaken about the exitence of the articles and then I came to the conclusion that I AM LOOKING AT ONE OF THE BIGGEST ACTS OF VANDALISM I EVER SEEN! It seems, however, as this page discussion indicates, that at least one of those conclusions was unfounded. This is outragious. There are many such series individual episode by episode articles on Wikipedia. I see no valid justification for taking a flamethrower to them. The views being posted here are indicative of a small group of users here setting a blanket policy on the entire comunity. Look at the edit histories of the individual articles. There are a lot of people here who put a considerable amount of effort into the creation of these articles. Will you please explain who you are to undertake such a reckless action? Just what possible reasoning could justify a total of 36 Wikipedia articles being put to the Guillotine? This is a smack in the face to everbody here. And if you are about to cite policy -- if this actually is policy, then the policy, in this case, should be changed! And fast! -- Jason Palpatine 06:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC) This User wishes (but too often fails) understanding of Wikipedia's systematized logistical projection of its balanced policy contingency. (speak your mind | contributions)
- Hmm, I actually wasn't expecting you to object. TTN's an extreme guy. The redirect master, you might say. Regardless, there wasn't much beyond summary material for those episodes. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- It helps that a lot of these are villain-of-the-week episodes, so the reader won't really miss much if a particular episode goes under-detailed. Maybe the plot episodes could use a bit more detail, though. My checklist is (with bolded episode titles being the most significant):
- And Then There Were 10
- Hunted
- Kevin 11
- The Alliance
- 'Secrets
TruthSufficient as it is; this one might even be cut down to leave behind mostly story-related events and info- Framed This one's almost done; all that's needed is the end result
- Grudge Match All that matters here is really the end result; part of what's already up can be condensed
- Ghostfreaked Out As with Grudge Match, part of what's up can be condensed to make room for the key parts
- Back With a Vengeance All that's really needed here is a conclusion
BenwolfSufficientUnder WrapsMore-or-less sufficient- The Return
- Be Afraid of the Dark
- Plus, minor expansion to the following episodes for -
- ...their additions to the Omnitrix:
The Big TickSufficient- Camp Fear Wildvine
- The Visitor This needs quite a bit more
- ...magical Gwen's development:
- Lucky Girl Not as important
- Tough Luck Just to introduce Charmcaster
- A Change of Face Spellbook
- This list can also be left open for future plot developments (For instance, if Enoch or Animo ever become significant, their initial appearances can be highlighted). I'll leave this up for a while before commencing for the sake of consensus. You Can't See Me! 01:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
But what about the episode notes and other stuff? You can't put it outside! I say you can bring the outside summaries inside and shorten the outside. Dylan Damien 01:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, none of those notes were extremely significant, so as to warrant keeping the article just for them. For the most part, these articles contained a scene-by-scene plot summary and a trivia section, both of which are generally frowned upon. You Can't See Me! 02:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Is there a need for the deletion of the single episodes articles?
I've been doing some looking around the site. There are MANY MANY simalar articles thoughout right here. Please take the time to follow the links bellow. Each one is similar to the original Ben 10 episodes liting. All of them (there are a lot more where these came from) are reference links to individulal episode articles:
- List of Doctor Who serials
- List of Star Trek: The Original Series episodes
- List of The 4400 episodes
- List of Babylon 5 episodes
- List of Star Trek: The Next Generation episodes
- List of Stargate Atlantis episodes
- List of Star Trek: Voyager episodes
- List of Star Trek: The Animated Series episodes
- List of Stargate SG-1 episodes
- List of The Outer Limits episodes
There are WAY too many examples/precidents on site for the ation we have been discussing to be allowed to stand. It is clearly a proper policy here for there to be a central listing of episodes article for a given series that provides links to individual articles for each episode. The extent of this practice is far too widespread thoughout the encylopedia for this to be considered anything but vandalism under the guise of editing/policy. If the fact that the articles contain mostly synopsisses is a problem, then people should endevoure to add whatever additional material they would consider helpfull.
REVERT NOW -- Jason Palpatine 09:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC) This User wishes (but too often fails) understanding of Wikipedia's systematized logistical projection of its balanced policy contingency. (speak your mind | contributions)
- Crap doesn't justify more crap. Anyways, it's fine to have separate discussions on an article by article basis. There is no set consensus to keep every episode. Nemu 10:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Crap? Your concept of crap leaves much to be desired. Of course, one person's gold is another person's crap, I guess. But, I would like to know why the articles relating to Ben 10 have been targeted? Are you actually saying that everything that branches from the Category:Lists of science fiction television series episodes is actually only crap? -- Jason Palpatine 14:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC) This User wishes (but too often fails) understanding of Wikipedia's systematized logistical projection of its balanced policy contingency. (speak your mind | contributions)
- All of the single episodes that those lists have are indeed crap. Less then 100 of the (tens of?) thousands of episode articles on this site actually need articles. This was singled out because I just happened to choose the category when looking for episodes to cut. I don't have an agenda or anything. Nemu 17:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Limax Episode Notes/Goofs
In that episode, Max was kidnapped and couldn't he use his Plumber Equipment?141.155.170.124 20:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)LesWong 4:40PM April 30, 2007