WikiProject assessment; Tag & Assess 2014 |
JosephusOfJerusalem (talk | contribs) →Post 15 February edits: new section |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums |class=C}} |
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums |class=C}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Post 15 February edits == |
|||
I have been checking the edits you have made since 15 February and I am quite disappointed with them. For one the section called '''Electoral malpractice''' is be full of [[WP:UNDUE]] content which would have been better suited under a title of '''''Extent of'' electoral malpractice'''. There is hardly any content which informs the reader about the rigging and the ways the governments rigged the elections and all the other nasty stuff they did with votes (that is content which falls under electoral malpractice), although there is a wealth of information in the excellent sources you have cited. There is also the problem of too many [[WP:ATTRIBUTION]]s when [[WP:YESPOV]] dictates that they not be used for undisputed content (see Shah case in Amira Kadal). It gets worse in that there is added [[WP:SYNTHESIS]] between (even worse) [[WP:SECONDARY]] and [[WP:PRIMARY]] sources. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jammu_and_Kashmir_Legislative_Assembly_election,_1987&diff=826194684&oldid=826008245 See this edit] where you have synthesized content between a secondary source and an official election commission paper. [[User:JosephusOfJerusalem|JosephusOfJerusalem]] ([[User talk:JosephusOfJerusalem|talk]]) 22:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:54, 19 February 2018
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post 15 February edits
I have been checking the edits you have made since 15 February and I am quite disappointed with them. For one the section called Electoral malpractice is be full of WP:UNDUE content which would have been better suited under a title of Extent of electoral malpractice. There is hardly any content which informs the reader about the rigging and the ways the governments rigged the elections and all the other nasty stuff they did with votes (that is content which falls under electoral malpractice), although there is a wealth of information in the excellent sources you have cited. There is also the problem of too many WP:ATTRIBUTIONs when WP:YESPOV dictates that they not be used for undisputed content (see Shah case in Amira Kadal). It gets worse in that there is added WP:SYNTHESIS between (even worse) WP:SECONDARY and WP:PRIMARY sources. See this edit where you have synthesized content between a secondary source and an official election commission paper. JosephusOfJerusalem (talk) 22:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC)