Content deleted Content added
TrangaBellam (talk | contribs) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor |
TrangaBellam (talk | contribs) →Polish version: Reply Tag: Reply |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:* A list of books published by the journal. |
:* A list of books published by the journal. |
||
[[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 14:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC) |
[[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 14:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Piotrus, if you find that there are reliable historians — though I doubt that you understand the term — who admire Glaukopis, feel free to add them. But otherwise, I take a dim view of your shenanigans. [[User:TrangaBellam|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam|talk]]) 14:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:56, 19 February 2023
To use
- 10.18318/td.2016.en.1.4
TrangaBellam (talk) 12:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Polish version
It has no information that suggests this en-wiki article to be NPOV. My analysis of the paragraphs:
- An unsourced paragraph on the aims of the journal, probably quoted from their website.
- An unsourced paragraph about the various people who are affiliated to them, probably quoted from their website.
- A paragraph that vouches for the reliability of the journal by citing a communique from a Polish Ministry. Then, there are details about accessing back-issues.
- A one-line paragraph about an award by (arguably) the party-magazine of PiS.
- A one-line paragraph about their EiC(s), probably quoted from their website.
- A list of books published by the journal.
TrangaBellam (talk) 14:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Piotrus, if you find that there are reliable historians — though I doubt that you understand the term — who admire Glaukopis, feel free to add them. But otherwise, I take a dim view of your shenanigans. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)