Marudubshinki (talk | contribs) m Robot: Automated text replacement (- the the + the ) |
Valentinian (talk | contribs) stub sorting using AWB |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Subsequently the [[Department of Defense]] instituted the [[Combatant Status Review Tribunal]]s. The Tribunals, however, were not authorized to determine whether the captives were ''lawful combatants'' -- rather they were merely empowered to make a recommendation as to whether the captive had previously been correctly determined to match the Bush administration's definition of an [[enemy combatant]]. |
Subsequently the [[Department of Defense]] instituted the [[Combatant Status Review Tribunal]]s. The Tribunals, however, were not authorized to determine whether the captives were ''lawful combatants'' -- rather they were merely empowered to make a recommendation as to whether the captive had previously been correctly determined to match the Bush administration's definition of an [[enemy combatant]]. |
||
Mahmud chose to participate in his [[Combatant Status Review Tribunal]].<ref name=CsrtMahmud> |
Mahmud chose to participate in his [[Combatant Status Review Tribunal]].<ref name=CsrtMahmud>[http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/Set_19_1561-1605.pdf Summarized transcripts (.pdf)], from Arkin Mahmud's''[[Combatant Status Review Tribunal]]'' - pages 22-24</ref> |
||
===allegations=== |
===allegations=== |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free. |
They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free. |
||
Mahmud chose to participate in his Administrative Review Board hearing.<ref name=ArbMahmud>[http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/ARB_Transcript_Set_5_20000-20254.pdf Summarized transcript (.pdf)], from |
Mahmud chose to participate in his Administrative Review Board hearing.<ref name=ArbMahmud>[http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/ARB_Transcript_Set_5_20000-20254.pdf Summarized transcript (.pdf)], from Arkin Mahmud's ''[[Administrative Review Board]] hearing'' - page 123</ref> |
||
===''The following factors favor continued detention:=== |
===''The following factors favor continued detention:=== |
||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
[[Category:Guantanamo Bay detainees|Mahmud, Arkin]] |
[[Category:Guantanamo Bay detainees|Mahmud, Arkin]] |
||
[[Category:Extrajudicial prisoners of the United States|Mahmud, Arkin]] |
[[Category:Extrajudicial prisoners of the United States|Mahmud, Arkin]] |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{GuantanamoBay-detainee-stub}} |
Revision as of 22:45, 26 June 2006
Arkin Mahmud is a citizen of China, held in extrajudicial detention in the United States Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, in Cuba.[1]
His detainee ID number is 103. The Department of Defense states Mahmud was born on July 1 1964, in Ghulja, China.
Mahmud is one of approximately two dozen detainees from the Uighur ethnic group.[2]
Combatant Status Review Tribunal
Initially the Bush administration asserted that they could withhold all the protections of the Geneva Conventions to captives from the war on terror. This policy was challenged before the Judicial branch. Critics argued that the USA could not evade its obligation to conduct a competent tribunals to determine whether captives are, or are not, entitled to the protections of prisoner of war status.
Subsequently the Department of Defense instituted the Combatant Status Review Tribunals. The Tribunals, however, were not authorized to determine whether the captives were lawful combatants -- rather they were merely empowered to make a recommendation as to whether the captive had previously been correctly determined to match the Bush administration's definition of an enemy combatant.
Mahmud chose to participate in his Combatant Status Review Tribunal.[3]
allegations
The allegations against Mahmud were:
- The detainee traveled from China in August 2001 and arrived in Afghanistan in September 2001.
- The detainee stayed at a guesthouse in Kabul, Afghanistan for approximately six weeks.
- The detainee was in Afghanistan when the U.S. bombing campaign began.
- The detainee traveled with an individual who may be involved with the East Turkistan Islamic Party (ETIP) aka East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM).
- The East Turkistan Islamic Movement is listed in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Terrorist Organization Reference Guide, as being one of the most militant groups, and has with ties to al Qaida.
- The detainee fled from Kabul to Kandas, Afghanistan when the U.S. bombing campaign started.
- The detainee was captured by the Northern Alliance in Mazar-E-Sheriff.
- The detainee was present during a Mazar-e-Sheriff prison uprising.
testimony
Mahmud acknowledged traveling to Afghanistan, staying at a guesthouse, and being present during the American bombing campaign.
Mahmud acknowledged that he may have traveled with someone who may have been involved with an East Turkistan Party, without his knowledge.
He denied any knowledge of the East Turkistan Party.
He acknowledged fleeing the US bombing. He didn't know who captured him. He acknowledged being present during the uprising at Mazar-e-Sharif.
Administrative Review Board hearing
Detainees who were determined to have been properly classified as "enemy combatants" were scheduled to have their dossier reviewed at annual Administrative Review Board hearings. The Administrative Review Boards weren't authorized to review whether a detainee qualified for POW status, and they weren't authorized to review whether a detainee should have been classified as an "enemy combatant".
They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free.
Mahmud chose to participate in his Administrative Review Board hearing.[4]
The following factors favor continued detention:
- a. Connections/Associations
- The detainee claimed he was extremely surprised to find out his brother had gone to a training camp.
- b Detainee Actions and Statements
- The detainee departed from his village in China on 21 August 2001, after his brother had called home telling his family that the brother was traveling to Pakistan.
- The detainee traveled from China to Karachi, Pakistan. From Karachi, the detainee made his way to Kabul, Afghanistan.
- The detainee stayed one and a half months in ]]guesthouse]] in Kabul.
- The detainee was told he had to leave the Kabul guesthouse. The detainee traveled to a house in Konduz.
- Shortly after the bombing started, the detainee was informed he needed to travel to Kandahar.
- The detainee boarded a truck he though (sic) was going to Kandahar with about 30 other occupants. However, instead of going to Kandahar, the truck drove to Mazar-e-Sharif, and all the occupants were imprisoned.
- c Other Relevant Data
- The detainee witnessed the Qual Jangi uprising.
The following primary factors favor release or transfer:
- The detainee stated he does not have a bad opinion of the United States. The detainee understands why he is here and thinks the United States is justified in conducting the investigation. The detainee understands the process of an investigation takes time and believes he will be found innocent.
- The detainee thinks he made a mistake by traveling to Afghanistan to find his brother. If he had the opportunity to change anything, he would have not traveled to Afghanistan.
- When asked if he had plans to attack the United States, the detainee laughed and stated, “No, of course not.” The detainee explained that he hoped to have the support of the United States if and when Turkistan separated from China.
- The detainee laments the deaths of so many innocent people in the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001. The detainee hates Usama bin Laden and blames him for his imprisonment in Cuba. The detainee understands why the United States invaded Aghanistan. The detainee believes the United States has been just and fair.
References
- ^ list of prisoners (.pdf), US Department of Defense, May 15 2006
- ^ China's Uighurs trapped at Guantanamo, Asia Times, November 4 2004
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Arkin Mahmud'sCombatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 22-24
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Arkin Mahmud's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 123