New page reviewer
( · view requests)
- DMySon (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci)
- Hi Everyone, i want to request for new page reviewer as i have reviewed many pages. Please check my Deletion log here. I think i am aware of WP:NOTE. DMySon 04:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 04:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- DMySon, I see that one of your relatively recent contributions, ONG&ONG was tagged for, among other things, possibly not meeting GNG and having WP:COATRACK content. Do you have any response to these tags? signed, Rosguill talk 20:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Rosguill, I created this article as per request here. I found it notable as per available references, notable works and awards. However, i will try to add more references to fully satisfy GNG and fix WP:COATRACK.DMySon 02:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- There haven't been any changes to the aforementioned article in a week, so I'm going to go ahead and close this as Not done. Feel free to reapply if you can either improve the article, or justify the current state of the article in a way that demonstrates that you understand relevant guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 00:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Rosguill, I created this article as per request here. I found it notable as per available references, notable works and awards. However, i will try to add more references to fully satisfy GNG and fix WP:COATRACK.DMySon 02:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- DMySon, I see that one of your relatively recent contributions, ONG&ONG was tagged for, among other things, possibly not meeting GNG and having WP:COATRACK content. Do you have any response to these tags? signed, Rosguill talk 20:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 04:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- M4DU7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci)
- I have created 14 articles (including 1 from a redirect and 1 from AFC) and recently became interested in browsing through (and AfD-ing) old articles that are promotional and/or do not satisfy our notability criteria. I feel like I understand the policies well enough and would like to chip in with new page review. I know that my editing numbers are not stellar, so I can understand if this request is declined. M4DU7 (talk) 22:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Not done Edit summary usage needs to improve and you need to understand content policies such as WP:NORG as well. Gain more experience and try again in a few months. qedk (t 愛 c) 15:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what is wrong with my understanding of WP:NORG. Anyway, thanks for the review. M4DU7 (talk) 17:28, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Not done Edit summary usage needs to improve and you need to understand content policies such as WP:NORG as well. Gain more experience and try again in a few months. qedk (t 愛 c) 15:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- KartikeyaS343 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci)
- I took a Wikibreak for personal reasons and my rights were expired. I would like to continue working on this, please. --KartikeyaS (talk) 07:20, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Not done Most of your edit summary usage are the ones that are automated, you used the right last on 1 April. Gain more experience and use edit summaries before requesting. qedk (t 愛 c) 15:19, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- QEDK Could you please re-assese because I always try to leave an edit summary whenever I make any edits without using twinkle or AFC script. For example you can check today's contributions. I didn't know edit summaries are a criteria for it. I was granted the right which has expired and I would like to request to assess the works I performed using this right please. --KartikeyaS (talk) 19:15, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- @KartikeyaS343: I won't reassess because there isn't anything else to assess, if you'd like I can leave this for some other admin to review, that's about it. --qedk (t 愛 c) 19:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- QEDK Could you please re-assese because I always try to leave an edit summary whenever I make any edits without using twinkle or AFC script. For example you can check today's contributions. I didn't know edit summaries are a criteria for it. I was granted the right which has expired and I would like to request to assess the works I performed using this right please. --KartikeyaS (talk) 19:15, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Not done Most of your edit summary usage are the ones that are automated, you used the right last on 1 April. Gain more experience and use edit summaries before requesting. qedk (t 愛 c) 15:19, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Ugbedeg (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci)
- Hello everyone, trust you're doing well and staying safe. I am requesting for new page reviewer right to help reduce the work load of new page reviewers and also reduce the backlog of new pages waiting for review. For instance, some of the articles I created are awaiting review for almost two months now and I believe other articles created by different editors are also waiting for review. Granting me this right will mean that at least one or two new articles will be reviewed daily. I have made over six thousand edits to about 600 articles and have created about 40 articles. I understand the composition of a new article and subject notability per WP standard.
Thank you all for the work you do. Ugbedeg (talk) 11:34, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 11:40, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Antila (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci)
- I was granted the NPR rights temporarily which expired today, I've done some new page reviews during this time and I'm requesting for a permanent access. Antila ✉ 05:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)