PEANUTBUTTERCOOOKIE! (talk | contribs) Tag: Reverted |
cmt Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
There was an artical and What i wrote is better then a redirect [[User:PEANUTBUTTERCOOKIE!|PEANUTBUTTERCOOKIE!]] |
There was an artical and What i wrote is better then a redirect [[User:PEANUTBUTTERCOOKIE!|PEANUTBUTTERCOOKIE!]] |
||
Yes, do start by working in the draft space. The text you added to [[Matt Mowers]] would not be acceptable as a Wikipedia article: it had no sources, it included almost no information, and it did not say anything about how Mowers is [[WP:N|notable according to Wikipedia's definition]]. The language had several problems, with almost every word capitalised, and some unintelligible phrasing ("NH GOP" is jargon that most readers won't understand). |
|||
Please do not restore your text again. This is extra important since you have already reverted other editors on that page three times today, and Wikipedia has a strict policy against [[WP:EW|edit warring]]. Reverting more than three times can lead to your account being temporarily blocked from editing. Instead, use the draft suggested by Theroadislong above, and work on the article there. Thank you. --''[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]'' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 18:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:16, 19 December 2020
Hi
Hello Welcome To My User Talk Page I am So exited to spread Info and The Truth
An article about Matt Mowers?
I would suggest creating any new article here Draft:Matt Mowers then you can work on it in peace and submit for review when ready. Theroadislong (talk) 17:33, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
There was an artical and What i wrote is better then a redirect PEANUTBUTTERCOOKIE!
Yes, do start by working in the draft space. The text you added to Matt Mowers would not be acceptable as a Wikipedia article: it had no sources, it included almost no information, and it did not say anything about how Mowers is notable according to Wikipedia's definition. The language had several problems, with almost every word capitalised, and some unintelligible phrasing ("NH GOP" is jargon that most readers won't understand).
Please do not restore your text again. This is extra important since you have already reverted other editors on that page three times today, and Wikipedia has a strict policy against edit warring. Reverting more than three times can lead to your account being temporarily blocked from editing. Instead, use the draft suggested by Theroadislong above, and work on the article there. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 18:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC)