Pepperbeast (talk | contribs) Only warning: Vandalism on Mirza Masroor Ahmad. Tag: Twinkle |
→December 2020: Reply Tag: Reply |
||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
I am familiar with Wikipedia standard but seems like putting a dubious tag at some statement in the article is a problem. Leave Wikipedia alone atleast. [[User:Azmarai76|Azmarai76]] ([[User talk:Azmarai76#top|talk]]) 11:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC) |
I am familiar with Wikipedia standard but seems like putting a dubious tag at some statement in the article is a problem. Leave Wikipedia alone atleast. [[User:Azmarai76|Azmarai76]] ([[User talk:Azmarai76#top|talk]]) 11:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Take it to the talk page. [[User:Majavah|Majavah]] ([[User talk:Majavah|talk!]]) 11:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your '''only warning'''; if you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, as you did at [[:Mirza Masroor Ahmad]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. {{Z190}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> [[User:pepperbeast|<strong><span style="font-family: 'Segoe Script';"><span style="color: #a10;">Pepper</span><span style="color: #0c1;">Beast</span></span></strong>]] [[User talk:pepperbeast|<span style="color: #200">(talk)</span>]] 11:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC) |
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your '''only warning'''; if you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, as you did at [[:Mirza Masroor Ahmad]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. {{Z190}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> [[User:pepperbeast|<strong><span style="font-family: 'Segoe Script';"><span style="color: #a10;">Pepper</span><span style="color: #0c1;">Beast</span></span></strong>]] [[User talk:pepperbeast|<span style="color: #200">(talk)</span>]] 11:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:20, 15 December 2020
February 2020
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Edit warring at Swati (Pashtun tribe)
- Swati (Pashtun tribe) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Hello User:Azmarai76. Both you and User:Haider khan10 have broken the WP:Three revert rule at Swati (Pashtun tribe) by making four reverts of the article within 24 hours. Can you explain why you shouldn't be blocked from editing Wikipedia? EdJohnston (talk) 15:29, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
i m editing with wikipedia for more than 14 years and had never been blocked, but now this user with a fake name Azmarai has some personal grudges with my tribe, and had used derogatory remarks for Swati Pashtuns, im active now and keep watching him all the time to barred him fake editing ... swatis are Pashto speaking Pashtuns! Thanks.. . . . . Haider khan10 (talk) 16:41, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Why would I have a grudge??? All I'm saying which Bettani subtribe are Swatis from since long Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 16:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
This disruptive editing you been doing since long that's why I confronted you today...... you think a person has to be a Pashtun to be a human and if he isn't born so he will lie about his race. Regards Haider bro Azmarai76 (talk) 16:57, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Don't destroy Wikipedia friend, it's an academic forum and not for falsification and that's what you have been doing since the last fourteen years. Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 17:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Continued edit warring at Swati (Pashtun tribe)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Edit warring at Swati (Pashtun tribe) which continued after my previous warning. Your above comments to Haider khan10 also seem to contain personal attacks ('lie about his race', 'falsification'). EdJohnston (talk) 18:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Well the fellow changes and instead of answering simple questions starts cursing Afghans and Pashtuns. He says Swatis are Bettanis... okay which subsection of Bettanis are they from ??? Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 20:13, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Khan Roshan Khan that he keeps saying has even made Katoors of chitral and Kattani kohistanis as Pashtuns. Ask the worthy fellow does it make them Pashtuns also???
Secondly, half of this tribe speaks Hindko and not Pashto will he categorize them as none Pashtun Swatis????
Roshan Khan was an author or a literary figure himself who wrote that " this tribe may also be Pashtun " but no one considers it so as all land records has been specific about them as Pashtunized tribe these included straight from Emperor Babur to latter British Raj which is the case still officially for them in Pakistan. Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 12:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Roshan Khan wasn't a literary figure or author himself. Sorry for the typo. Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 12:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
My sources aren't books that people keep writing to their benefits as If they are fighting a case from the scratch to categorize this tribe a Pashtuns. These are as following and verifiable online:-
1. Hazara Gazetteer 1883 and 1907 2. Imperial Gazetteer of India (1 and 2 both official documents) 3. Tribes of Hindukush (John Biddulph 1880) 4. Notes on Afghanistan (Maj. Raverty) 5. History of Afghans by Dorn B. 6. The Pathans by Olaf Caroe. 1950...1952 7. Kindgom of Cauble Elphistone. 8. Hayat e Afghan by Hayat Khan. 9. Khursheed e Jahan by Sher Muhammad Gandapur. 10. An inquiry into Ethnography of Afghanistan.
These are all printed by "publishers" and not by "printers" like the other Haider Khan 10 is presenting to build up his case of the tribe being Pashtun or Afghan.
Late in 1960s some of these communities did try to generate content to prove they are Afghans or Pashtuns all printed by "printers" and poorly sourced. Same is the case with this tribe.
The editors Haider Khan 10 couldn't even answer my simple question if this tribe is:-
1. Sarbarni 2. Karlanri 3. Ghorghusts 4. Bettanis ( he did try to make an edit to call Swatis as Bettani tribe without any idea which Bettanis subsection they are from????
He doesn't believe in fables as he always keep saying but trying to descend from these fables himself. (Strange isn't it)???.
Swatis are Pashtunized Tajiks of an old race once known "Dehqans" that's they name they have been joining the British Army and that Military paper is still valid for official purposes to date. Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 02:38, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
McKhan and his Vandalism
Hey, how's it going. I'm a fellow Pashtun and Wikipedia user and just want to ask you for assistance in a matter. You are aware that this user McKhan has been involved in vandalising Pashtun articles, including the Tanolis which was forced to be protected. He is still moving on to other other articles and deleting sourced material claiming it's "unsourced". As you and I know both know it's very difficult to find "Open Sources" to fullfill our ancestral history but we still manage to get sources and have the hard copies with ourselves. He has now filed a request to Administrators that this has been to push our POV of Pashtun when were are clearly just inserting lost pieces of history. He is utterly rude and disrespectful and has vandalized many other articles by pushing his POV and is complaining to Administrators that what we do is unverifiable and unsourced when we clearly provide the correct sources. Looking forward to your response. Thank you. Kkhan0818 (talk) 13:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Kkhan0818 and PashtunTribal548,
- I am not "vandalizing" the Pashtun articles. Not every Pashto speaker (i.e. Tanolis, Kakakhel (tribe)) is a Pashtun just like not all Khans are Pashtuns.
- Instead of responding to this incident, what you are indulging into is called canvassing by posting here. You should rather be discussing it on the incident page.
- It doesn't matter who is Pashtun on Wikipedia and who is not and/or who is a big shot or whose associate or whose relative or descendant, etc. It is all immaterial. What matters the most that whether Wikipedia guidelines are being followed or not.
- It is regrettable to say that you have been using two IDs, PashtunTribal548, Kkhan0818 and various IP addresses, a tantamount to sock-puppetry, to push your Pashtun POV first on Zakir Husain (politician) and now on Rahimuddin Khan as well as Iftikhar Hussain Khan Mamdot using unverifiable sources.
- Regarding your sources, see a detailed response from the pertinent team:
- "@McKhan: As to the first, if someone claims that this work supports a given statement on Wikipedia, they should be able to pinpoint to the relevant entry/page.' Since Rahimuddin Khan does not start with a letter between B and H and since (alphabetically-arranged) encyclopedias typically do not have an index, I don't see how I would ever find what they rely on. As to the second, since you seem to know that it is a collection of Wikipedia articles and since the publisher specifically says so (see here: "composed entirely of articles from Wikipedia that we have edited and redesigned into a book format"),''' I would respectfully submit that there is no need for any volunteer to waste their time trying to get ahold of this resource. Besides, no library knowingly acquires such books, and to the extent that a national library holds a deposit copy, these are generally more difficult to obtain than "ordinary" books. Again, I see no point in pursuing this request. Best, — Pajz (talk) 12:45 pm, Today (UTC−7)"
-
- It is not me who is being "rude and disrespectful" but yourself by parading around being the associate, relative or descendant of others to get leverage over Wikipedia guidelines.
- And last but not least, Za hum Pakhtun yum. Taso ta Pashto darzi? McKhan (talk) 15:14, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
You are tagging me in various pages accusing me of sock-puppetry and are threatening to block my account and then some.
Firstly, I have no relations with this user 'PashtunTribal548'. Secondly, I can see you have vandalized more articles related to Pashtuns by constantly pushing your POV and claiming that they are not sourced or verifiable, which is entirely the contrary as your assertions are subsequently disproved.
The user 'PashtunTribal548' is not the first. You have always come to this predicament to threaten to block users before you even want to reach a consensus with them on talk pages and instead try to pursue your own agenda. I can vouch for this based on my own experience with you. But you insist.
I will talk to a couple senior representatives on Wikipedia and will apprise them of the situation regarding your vandalism and disruptive editing. I will file a full report on you soon. Thank you. Kkhan0818 (talk) 15:57, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- The connection between Kkhan0818 and PashtunTribal548 is based upon this (i.e. "As I have stated before I am an associate of Mr. Khan...."), this and this. As per this and the edit history, I don't recall PashtunTribal548 ever stated before that PashtunTribal548 is an associate of Mr. Khan but Kkhan0818 definitely stated being an associate and relative or descendant. Finally, it is quite obvious that both ids, Kkhan0818 and PashtunTribal548, along with IPv6 addresses, are pushing a specific POV (i.e. agenda) of Zakir Husain (politician) (two verifiable sources were provided eventually) and Rahimuddin Khan being Afridi and Kheshgi. A CU request can reveal more. You are free to do whatever you want but first respond to this incident. McKhan (talk) 16:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
I see nothing wrong written at Tanolies page Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 16:50, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Tanolies have been tested genetically as R1b1 which attest their older version to the claim of being Turkic. Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 16:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
GS Alert
Template:Z33 USaamo (t@lk) 07:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Bro you have seen him youself he hasnt got no case now he says "Swatis are Pashtuns Culturally" earlier he was sure they are Bettanis… Azmarai76 (talk) 08:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes will see how long he will be bent on his stance but please follow the talk page guidelines while you discuss it there. WP:TALK USaamo (t@lk) 08:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes i understand ... he comes with his own story books not even known even to mention only Olaf Caroe and Sher Muhammad Gandapur should have been enough they all have pointed in concealed or explicit manner as tajik tribe that got pashtunized. I have given him the genetic data also and what Afghan intellectuals at Kabul now think about them. They were indeed rulers in Swat but overthrown because they were from dehqan race of tajiks. Seems like this friend wants to keep his former royal status and become a Pashtun more than Pashtuns thrmselves. Something not possible. Azmarai76 (talk) 09:04, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
Hello, I'm Austronesier. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pashtuns, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 06:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Definitely I will Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 07:21, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
2020
Azmarai76 (talk) 07:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- I think you're looking for WP:DR and/or WP:ANI. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes I am Azmarai76 (talk) 19:14, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- The matter is already under discussion on an admin's talkpage, you need to get Haider khan10 there and wait for the outcome. USaamo (t@lk) 12:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
December 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mirza Masroor Ahmad. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Majavah (talk!) 11:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
I am familiar with Wikipedia standard but seems like putting a dubious tag at some statement in the article is a problem. Leave Wikipedia alone atleast. Azmarai76 (talk) 11:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mirza Masroor Ahmad, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Template:Z190 PepperBeast (talk) 11:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)