Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof/Archives/2018/July) (bot |
|||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Re your undo earlier today, the reports of domestic violence have now been sourced by [http://www.citypages.com/news/keith-ellison-denies-domestic-abuse-accusation/490674681 | City Pages] and there's a denial by the Congressman. I'm going to re-add the previous information with better sourcing. [[User:ErikTheBikeMan|ErikTheBikeMan]] ([[User talk:ErikTheBikeMan|talk]]) 19:10, 12 August 2018 (UTC) |
Re your undo earlier today, the reports of domestic violence have now been sourced by [http://www.citypages.com/news/keith-ellison-denies-domestic-abuse-accusation/490674681 | City Pages] and there's a denial by the Congressman. I'm going to re-add the previous information with better sourcing. [[User:ErikTheBikeMan|ErikTheBikeMan]] ([[User talk:ErikTheBikeMan|talk]]) 19:10, 12 August 2018 (UTC) |
||
:If there are reliable sources discussing it, that's a different matter; but we will need to be exceedingly cautious about how we word uncorroborated negative claims about a living person. [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof#top|talk]]) 19:22, 12 August 2018 (UTC) |
:If there are reliable sources discussing it, that's a different matter; but we will need to be exceedingly cautious about how we word uncorroborated negative claims about a living person. [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof#top|talk]]) 19:22, 12 August 2018 (UTC) |
||
== August 2018 == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Bruce Ohr]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''The article is under a [[WP:1RR]] rule, you have made two reverts today. Please self-revert and gain consensus on removing long-standing sourced content. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bruce_Ohr&diff=855119754&oldid=855119710] & [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bruce_Ohr&diff=855122437&oldid=855122202]''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Rusf10|Rusf10]] ([[User talk:Rusf10|talk]]) 03:27, 16 August 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:27, 16 August 2018
3RR
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! ==
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Relay facts, not style
The news uses many words we don't, and many words we paraphrase. This is all perfectly legal. When they use a certain word in a way that means something else where we work, it's prudent to say what they mean, rather than precisely what they say. They also say these activists are "brave" and "courageous" for doing what what they do, but we disregard that sizzle and just relay what the source says they did. All sources agree they weren't shot, so didn't survive a shooting as everybody else in the category did. What you're doing here is exactly as foolish as categorizing school shooters (and many infamous people) as literal vermin, monsters or slime. If you insist on being fooled, I won't stop you beyond telling you so. InedibleHulk (talk) 18:08, March 12, 2018 (UTC)
This wasn't my change. It was the result of discussing on Talk, as you wish. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:07, March 12, 2018 (UTC)
Keith Ellison
Re your undo earlier today, the reports of domestic violence have now been sourced by | City Pages and there's a denial by the Congressman. I'm going to re-add the previous information with better sourcing. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 19:10, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- If there are reliable sources discussing it, that's a different matter; but we will need to be exceedingly cautious about how we word uncorroborated negative claims about a living person. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:22, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
Your recent editing history at Bruce Ohr shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
The article is under a WP:1RR rule, you have made two reverts today. Please self-revert and gain consensus on removing long-standing sourced content. [1] & [2] Rusf10 (talk) 03:27, 16 August 2018 (UTC)