Content deleted Content added
49.192.215.72 (talk) →Why here?: new section |
NatGertler (talk | contribs) →a few article problems: new section Tag: New topic |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
So why such a person who has lied so many times and has copied others’ books has his page on the Wikipedia? |
So why such a person who has lied so many times and has copied others’ books has his page on the Wikipedia? |
||
== a few article problems == |
|||
Just quickly noting a few problems with the article. |
|||
*It should not have a section titles "Controversy", per [[WP:CSECTION]]. I suggest "Unreliable narrator" for the first part of that section, and that the second part is best put as part of The Woman In The Window (novel) section (which should have it's "novel" sliced off. |
|||
*The opening contains a boastful statement sourced to a non-third-party source -- the claims of "millions" sold sourced to the publisher's website. This information should be removed. The statement that it was a "commercial success" should also be removed. |
|||
*Barring more deep coverage, information on who represents him should be removed. This is not a directory. |
|||
I did undo some promotional edits that were being readded. -- [[User:NatGertler|Nat Gertler]] ([[User talk:NatGertler|talk]]) 15:50, 27 November 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:50, 27 November 2023
Biography Start‑class | |||||||
|
United States Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Why here?
So why such a person who has lied so many times and has copied others’ books has his page on the Wikipedia?
a few article problems
Just quickly noting a few problems with the article.
- It should not have a section titles "Controversy", per WP:CSECTION. I suggest "Unreliable narrator" for the first part of that section, and that the second part is best put as part of The Woman In The Window (novel) section (which should have it's "novel" sliced off.
- The opening contains a boastful statement sourced to a non-third-party source -- the claims of "millions" sold sourced to the publisher's website. This information should be removed. The statement that it was a "commercial success" should also be removed.
- Barring more deep coverage, information on who represents him should be removed. This is not a directory.
I did undo some promotional edits that were being readded. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 15:50, 27 November 2023 (UTC)