Feedback Request Service notification on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment (1/2 this month). You can unsubscribe at WP:FRS. |
→I just want you to know I saw this: new section |
||
Line 200: | Line 200: | ||
[[File:Internet-group-chat.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]Your feedback is requested  at [[Talk:National Cabinet (Australia)#rfc_332F5BC|'''Talk:National Cabinet (Australia)'''  on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment]]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of [[WP:FRS|Feedback Request Service]] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by [[WP:FRS|removing your name]].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) | Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. | Sent at 06:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC) |
[[File:Internet-group-chat.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]Your feedback is requested  at [[Talk:National Cabinet (Australia)#rfc_332F5BC|'''Talk:National Cabinet (Australia)'''  on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment]]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of [[WP:FRS|Feedback Request Service]] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by [[WP:FRS|removing your name]].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) | Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. | Sent at 06:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC) |
||
== I just want you to know I saw this == |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=966787041 |
|||
Also, you might want to consider that “pride in [my] reputation for POV editing when it has been raised on their talk page“ is actually my amusement at a false reputation projected upon me by brazen hyperpartisans, which is often SOP in political debates when someone has lost the argument and run outta ammo. |
|||
Cheers [[User:Soibangla|soibangla]] ([[User talk:Soibangla|talk]]) 18:26, 9 July 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:26, 9 July 2020
Status: Offline
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hi Ad Orientem,
This editor that you had blocked for 24 hours (last Friday) has resumed doing disruptive editing on the same article Selena: The Series again. — YoungForever(talk) 05:46, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- @YoungForever: Final Warning issued. -Ad Orientem (talk) 06:16, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- This editor has resumed again doing disruptive editing again, this time specifically repeatedly adding WP:OR to the same article. — YoungForever(talk) 03:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- @YoungForever: Blocked x 1 week. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- This editor has resumed again doing disruptive editing again, this time specifically repeatedly adding WP:OR to the same article. — YoungForever(talk) 03:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Catholic Church and HIV/AIDS on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:KIA on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Brumby
Hi! Thanks for taking action at Brumby, that's been a time-sink. I wonder, though, how effective semi is going to be – the disruptive editor is autoconfirmed, so will still be able to edit. The protection will of course stop him using any more socks, but that's about all, I think. On the bright side, there seem to be signs that he is beginning to listen to what others have told him. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 07:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Justlettersandnumbers. We don't protect pages to deal with a single disruptive editor. If they continue to edit disruptively, formal warnings should be posted on their talk page. If that doesn't work the next step would be WP:ANI or WP:AIV if their behavior amounts to naked vandalism. Happy editing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Well, yes, that's why I was wondering why you chose to take that particular action. I'd have thought that something like a partial block from that one article might have been more effective. He's had several warnings, and it's already been at ANI, by the way. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:34, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, I have issued a final warning. If they resume their disruptive behavior let me know and I will indef them. This does appear to have gone on long enough. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Please accept my apologies for cutting across you, Ad Orientem. I saw the continuation at Talk:Brumby and issued an indefinite partial block from the article and its talk page without spotting your final warning. Please feel free to modify my block if you feel it appropriate. Regards --RexxS (talk) 18:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- @RexxS: No worries. I was more or less resigned that we were heading for some sort of long term block. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Please accept my apologies for cutting across you, Ad Orientem. I saw the continuation at Talk:Brumby and issued an indefinite partial block from the article and its talk page without spotting your final warning. Please feel free to modify my block if you feel it appropriate. Regards --RexxS (talk) 18:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, I have issued a final warning. If they resume their disruptive behavior let me know and I will indef them. This does appear to have gone on long enough. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Well, yes, that's why I was wondering why you chose to take that particular action. I'd have thought that something like a partial block from that one article might have been more effective. He's had several warnings, and it's already been at ANI, by the way. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:34, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Please explain block
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello, reading the wiki Guidlines of how to approach a dispute, going through due process and presenting evidence and asking questions. I am not edditing the page just asking questions and I think having valid arguments to move this page along. Please explain thankyou. 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 Shenqijing (talk) 18:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello can you please answer me directly as we need to move this decision on, I am very busy as I am a health professional. Shenqijing (talk) 23:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Shenqijing Your editing on Brumby was contrary to talk page WP:CONSENSUS which is what we live and die by. You engaged in edit warring and sock puppetry to pursue your preferred version of the article. You were even blocked for the socking. Frankly I think you are very fortunate not to have been indefinitely blocked given your behavior. As of right now I have serious doubts as to your being here to build an encyclopedia. I strongly advise you to drop the stick and move on to something else before your block becomes site wide. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping RexxS -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Shenqijing: Wikipedia has 6835655 articles and you can edit 6835654 of them. You don't seem to be aware of how close you are to losing the privilege to edit the remainder. Surely you can find another topic out of those that you could usefully contribute to? --RexxS (talk) 00:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping RexxS -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thankyou for you comments, I am hoping that by learning the wiki process that I can make valuable contributions to this subject. As as you know our members Nd grows with a little friction. Amituofo 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 Shenqijing (talk) 06:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Sorry I will say that again, Thankyou for you comments, I am hoping that by learning the wiki process that I can make valuable contributions to this subject the Brumby. As as you know, Our mind grows with a little friction. Amituofo 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 Shenqijing (talk) 06:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC) Shenqijing (talk) 06:57, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello again, we are in a sustainabile community so we share devices, We are not sock puppets and by the looks of it you also blocked a editor that was and has nothing to do with us. Amituofo 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 Shenqijing (talk) 07:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Eagle Eye: that did not take long
The IP is back to revert, still not participating on the article talk page. Thanks. El_C 01:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- @El C: 2601:18F:602:6970:0:0:0:0/64 blocked x 1 week. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt action, Ad Orientem. El_C 01:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- NP. I figured this was coming, but I prefer to give people every chance to avoid the hammer. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt action, Ad Orientem. El_C 01:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
You've got mail
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Mail-message-new.svg/40px-Mail-message-new.svg.png)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.JeffSpaceman (talk) 15:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Handled Thank you for the heads up. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for proving my cynicism misguided
Here [1]. Cheers, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:45, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- I do try. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Should Iraq be in this article, as it's not included. Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:48, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi David. I do have to admit that sometimes you come up with the most unexpected questions. And on this one, I can't say I have a strong answer. If Iraq is in fact an English word then the answer would be yes. But I don't know if it is. I suggest posting this question on the article talk page in the hopes of getting a more informed answer. Sorry I can't be more helpful on this one. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:01, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Well, I just thought that I would take a break from the stuff that I talk about the most and try something different for a change. And as for "the most unexpected questions", you don't mean that as a bad thing, do you? Davidgoodheart (talk) 04:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Not at all. Your questions are usually a break from the run of the mill stuff I deal with near daily. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:20, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Well, I just thought that I would take a break from the stuff that I talk about the most and try something different for a change. And as for "the most unexpected questions", you don't mean that as a bad thing, do you? Davidgoodheart (talk) 04:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Lil Huddy RevDel
Can you please oversight revisions 965172818 and 965173471 under RD2 and in order to not feed the trolls? Thanks. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 02:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Willsome429. Thanks for your alert to the disruptive editing going on. I have protected the page for a couple of days. The edits about someone being a GF aren't really the kind of stuff that require a revdel. We typically reserve that for defamatory stuff or slurs and the like. They've been reverted and the page is now protected. That should do for now. If this resumes let me know and we can escalate our response as needed. Thanks for all your work. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- The ones I specifically tagged accuse Huddy of being a sexual predator and "rapest". Should've dropped diff links the first time, but here it is. I haven't dealt too much with RevDel outside of copyvios so I'm not 100 percent sure it's RevDel material but it's definitely a serious unfounded accusation. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 03:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Willsome429, I'm not always up to date on euphemisms... but "stick figure" doesn't normally translate into rapist. I also did see someone named as his gf. Am I missing something here? -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Dropped the wrong diff link. I apologize. Double-checked these: [2]. and [3]. Apologize again for the confusion I caused. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 03:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Willsome429 Bingo! Those are the real deal "serious blp violations." And they got the IP an instant WP:ZT block. And yes I revdeled the edits. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. Glad I could finally get my ducks in a row for this one. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 03:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- NP and thanks for raising the red flag. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. Glad I could finally get my ducks in a row for this one. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 03:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Willsome429 Bingo! Those are the real deal "serious blp violations." And they got the IP an instant WP:ZT block. And yes I revdeled the edits. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Dropped the wrong diff link. I apologize. Double-checked these: [2]. and [3]. Apologize again for the confusion I caused. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 03:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Willsome429, I'm not always up to date on euphemisms... but "stick figure" doesn't normally translate into rapist. I also did see someone named as his gf. Am I missing something here? -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- The ones I specifically tagged accuse Huddy of being a sexual predator and "rapest". Should've dropped diff links the first time, but here it is. I haven't dealt too much with RevDel outside of copyvios so I'm not 100 percent sure it's RevDel material but it's definitely a serious unfounded accusation. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 03:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Private wikis and getting help
Hi, I just wanted to know if you know how much private wikis can be seen and if they can come up on search results like yahoo and google. Also do you know where I can find help with creating some? Cryptozoology is something that I might start with as this really intersts me. Davidgoodheart (talk) 07:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi David. This is a subject about which I know almost nothing. I did a quick search and there are two pages here that you might want to look at... Wiki and Wiki software. Beyond that I am afraid I will be of little help as I am not very tech savvy. You may wish to query Oshwah who I believe is well versed in tech and has both feet in the 21st century (unlike some other people). -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Reporting 2601:240:10C:996B:5D4C:456F:7A1E:ECC
2601:240:10C:996B:5D4C:456F:7A1E:ECC (talk · contribs)
Block evasion by MakaveliReed. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:51, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked x 1 week. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
One More Favor To Ask
Since we're here (and thank you for your assistance at Sambucus), would it be at all possible if I could ask if you could ratchet up the autoconfirmation at List of legendary creatures by type to semi-protection, and block , which is being used by an IP-hopping vandal to evade his blocks at other IPs? The page is being once again vandalized by a vandal who is inserting errors and original research into it. Thank you again very much for your time.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:22, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Done -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- I owe you a cookie recipe, if not my life.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- I love cookies (and cigars). -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- I owe you a cookie recipe, if not my life.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Unsolved murder?
Hi, is this and unsolved murder Ben Golden McCollum was shot dead by two robbers. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Do they know who did it? -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- I can't find that out, that is why I thought I would ask you this. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:41, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- I would not categorize it as unsolved unless reliable sources call it that. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
|
![]()
|
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
ITN recognition for Everton Weekes
On 2 July 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Everton Weekes, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 09:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
I was off Wikipedia since before the talk page message so I didn't see it
Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 14:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
You've got mail
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Mail-message-new.svg/40px-Mail-message-new.svg.png)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Doug Weller talk 13:55, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Block evasion by FortniteRishabS0122
I made this report in March of this year about this editor using multiple accounts for disruptive editing, it appears the editor is back again with a new account called SuperRC (talk · contribs). You can can it's same editor by looking at the range here. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 06:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Indeffed. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:16, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks but as Binksternet pointed out last time, the editor using IPs from Frisco, Texas through the range Special:Contributions/2600:1700:1113:B80:0:0:0:0/48. This range should be blocked. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Rangeblocked x 1 month. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:50, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks but as Binksternet pointed out last time, the editor using IPs from Frisco, Texas through the range Special:Contributions/2600:1700:1113:B80:0:0:0:0/48. This range should be blocked. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Block adjustment request
Hi! Could you unblock or allow account creation for this block? There's a professor from this school trying to set up an account, and who may run a Wikipedia editing assignment in their upcoming class, who is stuck behind the block. Thanks!--ragesoss (talk) 17:41, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Ragesoss: I have modified the block to permit account creation. But there has been a lot of disruptive editing that has come out of that IP range so I am not inclined to lift the block entirely. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:50, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! Account creation should be all they'll need.--ragesoss (talk) 17:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- NP. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! Account creation should be all they'll need.--ragesoss (talk) 17:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:National Cabinet (Australia) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
I just want you to know I saw this
Also, you might want to consider that “pride in [my] reputation for POV editing when it has been raised on their talk page“ is actually my amusement at a false reputation projected upon me by brazen hyperpartisans, which is often SOP in political debates when someone has lost the argument and run outta ammo.