Content deleted Content added
m reword my unclear phrasing |
SportingFlyer (talk | contribs) →Louis Sola: this shouldn't be entertained further |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Endorse'''. Consensus at the AfD discussion was that he is not notable, despite his role at United States Federal Maritime Commission as a commissioner which was, as far as I remember, in the article when it was being discussed. That consensus was read correctly by the closer. [[User:Phil Bridger|Phil Bridger]] ([[User talk:Phil Bridger|talk]]) 08:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Endorse'''. Consensus at the AfD discussion was that he is not notable, despite his role at United States Federal Maritime Commission as a commissioner which was, as far as I remember, in the article when it was being discussed. That consensus was read correctly by the closer. [[User:Phil Bridger|Phil Bridger]] ([[User talk:Phil Bridger|talk]]) 08:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC) |
||
*'''Procedural endorse'''. DRV is only necessary when you believe you believe the XfD result is invalid. Else, if it now meets requirements, just recreate it. Note that the appointment might not guarantee notability, so it may be wise to evaluate the sources and ask at the [[WP:AFCHD|AfC help desk]] to ensure it meets the inclusion criteria. [[User:Alpha3031|Alpha3031]] ([[User talk:Alpha3031|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alpha3031|c]]) 10:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Procedural endorse'''. DRV is only necessary when you believe you believe the XfD result is invalid. Else, if it now meets requirements, just recreate it. Note that the appointment might not guarantee notability, so it may be wise to evaluate the sources and ask at the [[WP:AFCHD|AfC help desk]] to ensure it meets the inclusion criteria. [[User:Alpha3031|Alpha3031]] ([[User talk:Alpha3031|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alpha3031|c]]) 10:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC) |
||
:*Considering this was just at DRV one week ago, was closed as a clear endorse because the requirements were not met, and the nominator's only contribution to Wikipedia at this point has been this deletion review, I'm leaning much more towards a possible sock/COI issue than encouraging recreation of the article. [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;">[[User talk:SportingFlyer|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/SportingFlyer|C]]</span>'' 19:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:09, 15 February 2019
15 February 2019
Louis Sola
- Louis Sola (talk||history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)
Not everyone has enough sources but it also doesn't mean that he is not notable. He is the current commissioner of Federal Maritime Commission (official link). If his failure at 24th Congressional District of Florida as a Republican political candidate doesn't makes him notable but his role at United States Federal Maritime Commission as a commissioner does makes him notable. XFD took place on December 2017, re-direct result seems valid however his appointment as a commissioner on Nov 16, 2018 can be now considered and page can be restored now. Robwilsons (talk) 05:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- This was endorsed as a delete just over a week ago. Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 January 30 SportingFlyer T·C 06:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Endorse. Consensus at the AfD discussion was that he is not notable, despite his role at United States Federal Maritime Commission as a commissioner which was, as far as I remember, in the article when it was being discussed. That consensus was read correctly by the closer. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Procedural endorse. DRV is only necessary when you believe you believe the XfD result is invalid. Else, if it now meets requirements, just recreate it. Note that the appointment might not guarantee notability, so it may be wise to evaluate the sources and ask at the AfC help desk to ensure it meets the inclusion criteria. Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Considering this was just at DRV one week ago, was closed as a clear endorse because the requirements were not met, and the nominator's only contribution to Wikipedia at this point has been this deletion review, I'm leaning much more towards a possible sock/COI issue than encouraging recreation of the article. SportingFlyer T·C 19:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)