Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Article | Talk:Variant of uncertain significance (Log · Page History) |
User | Slashme (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 23 |
Minor edits | 2 (8.7%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
Reverted edits | 1 (4.3%) |
atbe1 | 0.6 |
Added (bytes)2 | 5,818 |
Deleted (bytes) | -277 |
Minor edits
·
2 (8.7%)
Major edits
·
21 (91.3%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
23 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
1 (4.3%)
Unreverted edits
·
22 (95.7%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2017-02-02 09:06 | Diff · History | 193 | →supplemental viewing section: I think there's an important distinction to be made between reliable sources and promotional sources here. |
2017-01-31 19:26 | Diff · History | 525 | →supplemental viewing section: removed one video; some formatting. WP:YT applies. |
2017-01-24 22:00 | Diff · History | -43 | →Review of sources: rm comment that I forgot to edit out. |
2017-01-24 21:59 | Diff · History | 23 | →Review of sources: not just research articles, other weak sources. |
2017-01-24 21:58 | Diff · History | 29 | →Review of sources: Given my opinions. |
2017-01-24 21:57 | Diff · History | 255 | →Review of sources: Keep WebMD article: uncontentious. |
2017-01-24 21:55 | Diff · History | 58 | →Review of sources: Describe my suggestion |
2017-01-24 21:55 | Diff · History | 386 | →Review of sources: Maybe don't deal separately with the studies that say that vague VUS reports stress patients out and confuse doctors |
2017-01-24 21:52 | Diff · History | 385 | →Review of sources: Smemo et al. - not urgent, only illustrative. |
2017-01-24 21:50 | Diff · History | 211 | →Review of sources: Find better source for Kühnemund |
2017-01-24 21:48 | Diff · History | 196 | →Review of sources: Find better source than Grand View website. |
2017-01-24 21:47 | Diff · History | 148 | →Review of sources: Keep Marotta: historical significance only. |
2017-01-24 21:46 | Diff · History | 537 | →Review of sources: new section |
2017-01-23 08:13 | Diff · History | 499 | →suggested revision of history section: I wouldn't do it, but I won't stop you. |
2017-01-22 18:45 | Diff · History | 102 | →Whipping a dead horse and accomodating the visually impaired at the same time.: Concede Dbfirs's point about the caption. |
2017-01-22 14:07 | Diff · History | 19 | →Whipping a dead horse and accomodating the visually impaired at the same time.: clarify |
2017-01-22 14:06 | Diff · History | 406 | →Whipping a dead horse and accomodating the visually impaired at the same time.: Tulips have been described as "garish" since the 1870s. |
2017-01-21 23:22 | Diff · History | 308 | →Lead paragraph: new section |
2017-01-21 23:08 | Diff · History | -234 | →First sentence: Actually, let me try and fix this instead of complaining. |
2017-01-21 23:03 | Diff · History | 234 | (reverted) →First sentence: new section |
2017-01-21 22:58 | Diff · History | 10 | →Whipping a dead horse and accomodating the visually impaired at the same time.: clear template to separate my text from the text above. |
2017-01-21 22:57 | Diff · History | 1,173 | →Whipping a dead horse and accomodating the visually impaired at the same time.: Some comments and cuts. Use the alt tag for descriptions. |
2017-01-20 14:00 | Diff · History | 355 | →The TULIP caption: Thank you! |
All times are in UTC.