- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
বিজয় চক্রবর্তী
Final (0/6/2); ended 23:24, 7 August 2013 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 23:24, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination
বিজয় চক্রবর্তী (talk · contribs) – I am Bijoy Chokroborti and I have edited a lot of articles related to topics like Bengal, Bangladesh, Bengali language, etc. I wish to be an administrator to help fight Vandalism and other kinds of errors on Wikipedia in a better manner. I hope I can! বিজয় চক্রবর্তী (Bijoy Chokroborti) ✉ 16:25, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: To fight Vandalism, and other kinds of errors on Wikipedia, to help keep the health of Wikipedia better! ^_^
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: As I am a native user from Bengal, I can help contribute Wikipedia in topics related to my region very best and develop them! Develop Bengal related articles more and more, So that Wikipedia's size increases :)
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: Yea, I have had a couple of edit wars with unknown IPs, It also caused me stress, and want to fight more strongly against Vandalism by being an administrator!
General comments
- Links for বিজয় চক্রবর্তী: বিজয় চক্রবর্তী (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for বিজয় চক্রবর্তী can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Discussion
Support
Oppose
- I appreciate your enthusiasm, but you're not ready yet. Once you've gained substantial experience (which often means many more edits) without conflict, I can look forward to supporting you.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Administrators are usually expected to have thousands of edits and years of experience. You don't have either at the moment, but I'd be happy to reconsider in a couple years. However, you seem to indicate that you'd use the tools against other users that you are in edit wars with, which is definitely concerning. Consider reading this essay, as well as this policy page. --SamX‧☎‧✎‧S 19:41, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Oppose Non existent content creation and user has a history of promoting of fringe views and weird nationalistic editing. The Legend of Zorro 19:44, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe in a year or two, but not now. I do love your enthusiasm, though. :) The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 19:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per WP:TOOSOON. Mkdwtalk 20:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose at this time. You registered on May 13th of this year and are applying for adminship with just over three months experience? I was going to be neutral until I saw the registration date. Many time editors with even a couple of years under their belt are not considered time tested. I hear a lot of positive things from others but with no co-nomination and only three months, I just cannot be neutral.--Mark Just ask! WER TEA DR/N 22:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
- Not yet. You'll probably need at least 10 months of experience. AutomaticStrikeout ? 19:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You need a lot more experience. You've started well, and I've personally seen some very good interactions from you. Reaching out to other users and working with them is good, and I see you do that.
But... Read some of the linked documents from WP:NOTNOW and try again later, and also take particular notice of the specific points about WP:NPOV, WP:WAR, WP:FRINGE raised above. Try to leave any preconcieved biases at the door and edit neutrally, and thanks for volunteering to help so early. Begoon talk 20:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.