15 October 2016
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I believe that deleted revisions of the article should be restored. Lava03 (talk) 15:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I believe that this version of the page should be restored. This is an article about an ethnic group. It definitely exists; People of India: Rajasthan has a chapter on them. All the rationales given at the AFD are invalid and it was poorly attended. The nominator made no statement at all, one of the only two other participants said they could not "tell what thing it is" despite the first sentence of the article saying "Kumawat is community of the people living mainly in [list of places]", and the other participant suggested that there were "notability questions". Certainly the article has many problems, but if there are policy reasons that it can be said that an ethnic group is non-notable then there is something seriously wrong with our criteria for inclusion. It seems more like a bad dose of US/Euro-centrism to me and an unwillingless to do simple checks like look up Gotra on Wiktionary which would have immediately explained to the participants why the "rambling" list they complained about was actually relevant to the article. To be clear, I don't care about the current prod of the recently recreated page as a surname page. That aspect can be taken care of by adding a list of notable people called Kumawat to the article (we currently only have one article in that category). SpinningSpark 14:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Received coverage in multiple reliable sources [1] [2][3][4], also, an investigation into the accident has since been released [5]. I believe that there is enough content to be worthy of an article. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 01:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
This page was redirected to Artisan Entertainment last month because someone stupidly decided that the company isn't notable, but it is notable because it was a big name for VHS and a lot of its VHS's are collected by buffs. Most of the reliable sources found for the article came from Google Books, mainly the Billboard magazines, so it barely has reliable news sources. But here are more sources I found: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Family_Home_Entertainment#More_references 89.11.210.35 (talk) 22:34, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
This page was deleted in January because of so-called "copyright infringement", which is untrue because TVPaint deserves a Wikipedia article for being a popular raster-based animation software. If someone wants to fix the article to avoid violations, then they need to rewrite the article based on sources, along with http://wiki.tvpaint.com/index.php?title=TVPaint and the other links here which I found, instead of deleting it altogether. 89.11.210.35 (talk) 22:38, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |