- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nja247 08:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Xtreme 3D
- Xtreme 3D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
software with no assertion of notability Ironholds (talk) 07:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- what should one do so his article won't be deleted? User:Gecko89 (talk) 11:50, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Find Reliable, third-party sources per Wikipedia:Notability, as you've been told. Please change your signature; it displays you as User:Gecko, which you are not. Ironholds (talk) 07:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've corrected Gecko89's sig links Marasmusine (talk) 10:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Find Reliable, third-party sources per Wikipedia:Notability, as you've been told. Please change your signature; it displays you as User:Gecko, which you are not. Ironholds (talk) 07:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:46, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I see no indication of notability. - TexasAndroid (talk) 21:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - long, bullet-pointed lists of Features are usually a bad sign. Does not pass our notability threshold. Marasmusine (talk) 10:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – I cannot find anything that can establish notability here. MuZemike 18:13, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.