- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tobago official football team
- Tobago official football team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD was contested. Claim that it is a national team when Tobago is not actually a nation. Claim that references establish at least a minimum for notability. Comment Thought a discussion should be established as there are obviously conflicting thoughts about its notability. Delusion23 (talk) 16:11, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 16:41, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not a national team, merely representative one which has no formal affiliation and which has only played in five unofficial friendlies in a decade - I'd say this is of similar note to celebrity teams which play for charity i.e. not very! GiantSnowman 16:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I declined the proposed deletion, mostly because I did think that it was worth some public comment. The references do appear to confirm its existence, and while not a "national" team, it does claim to represent a substantial community. It does seem to have been only occasionally active. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:51, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - It's an independent football team. Pelmeen10 (talk) 15:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It isn't a national team, merely a representative one. My county of birth has a representative team, but having a separate article for it wouldn't be justified because it just isn't notable enough. There is a section for it here which I think is acceptable. I'd recommend a similar arrangement for this team. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 03:54, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence that the body selecting this team has any widespread authority, and so the team has no grounds to claim that it is representative. Kevin McE (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.