- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Neutralitytalk 06:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Taupo glory afc
- Taupo glory afc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined prod by IP address without improvement. Prod reason was "Non-notable as per WP:NFOOTY" Hasteur (talk) 11:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable, unsourced and self-promotional. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 18:57, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete new non-notable 1 year old 1-team youth club that has not played at a level that would confer notability and has not done anything of note. unsourced COI self promo--ClubOranjeT 09:12, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:49, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable youth team. GiantSnowman 13:50, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable and completely unsourced. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 15:54, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.