- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Shigeru Nakanishi
- Shigeru Nakanishi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references of notability. Johnduhart (talk) 23:23, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No third-party coverage to demonstrate notability. --DAJF (talk) 14:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 09:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. --DAJF (talk) 11:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.