- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I think salting Sergey Lepmets would be premature, since this seems to be the first time that title has been used, and this player may become notable in the future. But if another admin feels salting is appropriate I have no objections. Rlendog (talk) 02:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sergei Lepmets
AfDs for this article:
- Sergei Lepmets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:00, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:00, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:00, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:00, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to closing andmin - If this article is deleted, please delete salt the redirect at Sergey Lepmets. Existing create protection was bypassed using this spelling. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:00, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 18:02, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Still fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 10:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:NFOOTY--current team is Romanian second division, not first, as this article claims. Translated some of the Google hits, and all appear as WP:ROUTINE as you would expect. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:58, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.