- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Salvador Ruiz
- Salvador Ruiz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was Non-notable footballer; hasn't appeared in a fully-professional league, so fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also fails WP:GNG. PROD was contested by an IP without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:26, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:26, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Adrián Lluna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:26, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:26, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:26, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Under current rule for professional league and professional league. Segunda División B isn't listed in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues. Matthew_hk tc 17:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original PRODder. Both clearly fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 10:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both. Fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 19:04, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:54, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.