- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:36, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Rsbot
- Rsbot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable bot that doesn't even exist any more. My db-web tag was removed by a user who claims that it doesn't apply to software. This is a bot that ran on a website, so to me, db-web should apply, but whatever, we'll have to go the long route here. Woogee (talk) 23:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, leaning towards delete: I stumbled on this while searching through redirects to RuneScape and was a little concerned about its notability (how many cheat programs and bots exist for MMOs?) Out of its references, 1 and 3 are external links and not references, and 4 is a forum. Only 2 seems to indicate noteworthiness and that's more about the maker being sued. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 16:06, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - subject cannot be verified through reliable sources. Marasmusine (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.