- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snowball Keep --JForget 00:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ram Shanker
- Ram Shanker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not a significant player to be consider worthy enough for a wiki page Frankie goh (talk) 13:43, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Passes WP:ATHLETE as he's played in the S.League, a fully professional league. пﮟოьεԻ 57 14:18, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per WP:BIO. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Number57. GiantSnowman 14:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Per above. Sunderland06 (talk) 15:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As a professional player playing in a professional league, passes WP:ATHLETE. Shovon (talk) 16:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per everything above. Fully professional player. RC-0722 361.0/1 20:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Close Appears nominator wasn't aware of the WP:ATHLETE policy. No biggie, I'm still learning new things every day too. Townlake (talk) 22:21, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.