- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep all. — Joseph Fox 18:27, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pol. Viribus Unitis
- Pol. Viribus Unitis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Reason for PROD was "Non-notable amateur club per WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN". PROD was contested with no reason given.
Viribus Unitis have never played for a national cup competition (failing WP:FOOTY) and for the lack of media coverage, it fails WP:GNG as well.
Also, for the exact same reason, i am also nominating these six articles for deletion:
- A.D.C. Ars et Labor Grottaglie
- A.S.D. Real Nocera Superiore
- A.S. Valle Grecanica
- A.C. Palazzolo A.S.D.
- U.S.D. Noto Calcio
- A.S.D. Sarnese 1926
--Kosm1fent Won't you talk to me? 06:51, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Kosm1fent Won't you talk to me? 07:14, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep all - Although many clubs from Serie D do not meet WP:FOOTYN criteria, on a common sense basis I contend that teams playing at the fifth tier of Italian football are notable. There are almost 50 leagues in England in which all clubs are considered notable; exclude Serie D and that would leave just six in Italy. At this discussion and this discussion, it was recently agreed that WP:FOOTYN was not fit for purpose, because it favours teams from countries with large national cups (e.g. France has over 6000 teams in theirs; Italy has 78). This is not an argument that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, because it concerns a single guideline. Deserter1 talk 13:19, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Deserter1. GiantSnowman 13:58, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep all per Deserter1. User :Kefalonitis94 (talk) 23:55, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all. Like the article about S.S. Todi, following the guidelines, this clubs have no notability at all. CapPixel (talk) 18:32, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep all for the same reasons Deserter1 explained above. 23:49, 2 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.129.53.170 (talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 22:50, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 22:50, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.