- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 01:13, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Philip Clemo
- Philip Clemo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I declined this speedy deletion candidate and chose to nominate it here instead. This appears to be a biography of an individual who does not meet our guidelines for inclusion (WP:BIO and the general notability guideline). It does not appear as though he is the source of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Protonk (talk) 07:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Quick google search shows coverage in major British sources [1], [2], [3]. These should be incorporated in the article --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 14:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Omarcheeseboro has shown clear notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:46, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.