- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Neotel (cycling team)
- Neotel (cycling team) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is not notable. A WP:BEFORE search found no reliable independent sources that significantly covered the subject. Therefore the article does not pass the WP:GNG and should be deleted. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 13:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Apparently you don't know, but UCI Continental teams do meet the guidelines for notability. They are professional cycling teams. The article needs expansion, which i was planning on doing today.--Seacactus 13 (talk) 14:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- WP:NCYC. it clearly states that all WT, PCT and CT (which this team is) are deemed notable for Wikipedia.--Seacactus 13 (talk) 00:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T/C) 21:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep As per Seacactus 13, meets WP:NCYC XyZAn (talk) 07:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment @XyZan: While the specific guideline has been provided, I would like to be reassured that the GNG is passed as well. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 08:09, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Ideally merge somewhere as I believe KAP03's statement about search results and the GNG, and this was a very short-lived team. Keep it until a good place to merge has been found/created. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 06:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:07, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:NCYC. Smartyllama (talk) 13:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.