- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deletion of the snowball variety. Marasmusine (talk) 11:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Living In Runescape
- Living In Runescape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD deleted by creator without comment - Fails WP:NOTMANUAL Codf1977 (talk) 08:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unsourced original research and because Wikipedia is not a manual or how-to guide.--BelovedFreak 13:15, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow delete -- a classic example of WP:NOTMANUAL. There's no way for this article to survive, so let it snow. --Teancum (talk) 14:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow delete A good faith effort to help new RS players, but a misunderstanding of what WP is for. Guides like these are important for complex MMOGs, which is why they're quickly put together on fansites and game-specific wikis, there'll be several out there for RuneScape. Someoneanother 16:58, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Soon, if not now. The intent is good, but sadly misplaced as we are not the RuneScape Wiki, a fansite, or any how-to manual. Others have already said it - this concretes it. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 20:26, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.