- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 01:23, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List of Tarkhans
- List of Tarkhans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Previously discussed on AFD in Oct/Nov 2006; nominated for deletion via WP:PROD in Aug 2007. Outcome of prior AFD was 'keep', but looking at the discussion suggests the actual outcome was 'no consensus'. Current re-nomination for deletion (by PRODing) was "like List of Rajputs"; the 'List of Rajputs' article is currently on AFD here, which sports the following reason for nominating for deletion "Appears to be yet another virtually unsourced and verifiable caste list. Wikipedia is not a directory, nor is it an indiscriminate collection of information. This is practically the same as List of Nairs, which was deleted in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nairs." User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. Nenyedi • (Deeds•Talk) 02:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Famous Tarkhans might be notable, but I get the distinct impression that this is something better handled by a category. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the tiger. This would be better handled by a category. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 03:00, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- D better as a cat actually. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 03:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as a cat, but most of the names are "black". --Hirohisat Talk 03:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Yup better as a cat, that way we can guarantee that only notable individuals are there. - Caribbean~H.Q. 04:04, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as list of loosely associated names - Category should suffice Corpx 04:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Completely unsourced list. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. utcursch | talk 04:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Punkmorten 09:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Tarkhan Mandsford 17:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Turn into category. ¿SFGiДnts! ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 20:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.