- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Disruptive nomination by blocked user. (non-admin closure) Paul_012 (talk) 15:01, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Lam Khlong Ngu
- Lam Khlong Ngu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG - No indication for relevance thus fails notability. KnowledgeChuck (talk) 12:34, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:55, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. National parks are inherently notable. Protected areas of this scale are guaranteed to have enough sources about them to meet GNG. – Uanfala (talk) 16:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. The nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. I'm not prepared to waste the energy involved in checking whether the sockmaster is formally banned, but this meets the spirit of WP:SK#4. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:57, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.