- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kyle Nasta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Same reason as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramak Safi, which is how I found this page also. Kyle Nasta started 1 league game during his very short senior career, and was substituted once. Note: His career is not ongoing, and the team no longer exists. No independent significant coverage. Geschichte (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 21:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - scraping by on NFOOTBALL is insufficient when there is a complete lack of coverage, failing GNG. GiantSnowman 21:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete no reasonable criteria would make Nasta a notable soccer player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:01, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It's better to have a complete set of articles here for WP:NFOOTBALL than maintain a complete set on another site and a separate incomplete set here. Subject-specific guidelines are more important than WP:GNG as a reason to delete an article, there's no reason to say they shouldn't be as a reason to keep an article. Peter James (talk) 16:54, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 17:58, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and User:Johnpacklambert Spiderone 19:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.