- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 21:36, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Jyotsna Dhawan
- Jyotsna Dhawan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability missing. No coverage in media for whatsoever contribution to Indian Science and Technology. Article not sourced, or sourced with unreliable citations such as PHDTREE. WP is not a replacement for facebook page. Educationtemple (talk) 17:49, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:FAILN, Only references in article are primary sources. Search shows that he has written a fair bit of material but the material isn't notable since it hasn't received significant secondary coverage. Per WP:ALTERNATIVE I recommend writing this content in WikiBios not an encyclopedia. Bryce Carmony (talk) 19:15, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:FAILN and does not WP:PROF — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.65.35.94 (talk) 07:45, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ― Padenton|✉ 21:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ― Padenton|✉ 21:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.