- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jamie☆S93 21:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- JohnnyTwoShoes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Webgame designer company, but no evidence for notability. Searching gives lots of hits but couldn't find anything to meet WP:CORP or WP:WEB. Quantpole (talk) 21:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I updated it from historical information, I think deletion should be removed.--meridimus 23:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meridimus (talk • contribs)
- Comment You know, in parts, it seems like advertising.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 21:26, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Spam article Arma virumque cano (talk) 02:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC) This user has since been blocked as a sockpuppet. - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 18:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is no coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources (required by WP:CORP). Johnuniq (talk) 00:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No verified coverage in independent sources. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 18:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Ost (talk) 18:52, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Article should not be deleted. Large scale site, information is accurate, especially after major update. Alltellg (talk) 01:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Where's its real-world coverage in secondary sources, though? Articles are not included on Wikipedia on the subjective basis that the subject is "large" or "accurate"; its significance must be verified via sourcing. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 01:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and try again when you can cite your sources and write in a neutral tone. Marasmusine (talk) 13:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.