- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 19:07, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Joe Andrew (footballer)
- Joe Andrew (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. He has played football for a semi-professional club, but fails WP:ATHLETE because he has not participated in a fully professional match. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 20:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith talk 22:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. FA cup and League Cup appearances between football clubs at the national level = notable. – iridescent 20:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- All of those games are at a semi-professional level. Please read WP:ATHLETE. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 20:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:ATHLETE doesn't apply to football & cricket, per very very lengthy discussions. Please read the football notability guidelines which differ from WP:ATHLETE. "Have played in a competitive fixture between two "FPNL clubs" (in the FA Cup or League Cup, non-English equivalent, Continental or Intercontinental club competition)" equals notable for WP purposes. – iridescent 20:23, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "FPNL" means Fully Professional National Level. Alloa Athletic are not fully professional. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Plus of course WP:FOOTYN was roundly rejected by the overall community and therefore is in no way binding anyway -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "FPNL" means Fully Professional National Level. Alloa Athletic are not fully professional. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "WP:ATHLETE doesn't apply to football & cricket, per very very lengthy discussions" - can you expand on that? Why wouldn't it apply? Nfitz (talk) 00:21, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:ATHLETE doesn't apply to football & cricket, per very very lengthy discussions. Please read the football notability guidelines which differ from WP:ATHLETE. "Have played in a competitive fixture between two "FPNL clubs" (in the FA Cup or League Cup, non-English equivalent, Continental or Intercontinental club competition)" equals notable for WP purposes. – iridescent 20:23, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 20:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Jimbo[online] 23:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete Though the notability guidelines for this are ambiguous when cups are taken into account. Brilliantine (talk) 00:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The notability guidelines in that area are equally clear. A cup game has to be between two fully professional clubs. He has played against fully professional clubs in cup ties, but not for one. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 06:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 12:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Hubschrauber729 (talk) 23:06, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- He played in senior football in Scotland in 2007/08. Andrew himself was part time with Alloa but all his appearances were in "fully professional" matches in the SFL. For whats it worth several games were against full-time opposition. If playing in Divisions 2 and 3 is grounds for deletion you have a lot of work to do. Andrew is now back in the junior ranks with Arthurlie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Domhnall1979 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- See above, the matches were by definition not fully professional because Alloa are a semi-professional club. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 05:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.