- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per G7 - One author who has requested deletion [1] Nancy talk 18:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Goalscorers in the Football League Championship 2008-09
- Goalscorers in the Football League Championship 2008-09 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article is a long and sprawling list of statistics, per WP:NOT#STATS which are unnecessary details beyond that listed at Football League Championship 2008–09. This is superfluous detail, which is best in an almanac and not in an encyclopedia. See also the prod for List of Serbian Superliga 2008–09 scorers and List of Goalscorers in the Football League Two 2008-09 Season. Peanut4 (talk) 03:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Peanut4 (talk) 03:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. – PeeJay 04:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge the highlights into the article about the season, and/or rewrite to reflect notable facts about the scoring title. If nothing is salvageable, then deletion wouldn't be uncalled-for, per nomination. TheFeds 05:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - top scorers already in the main Championship 2008-09 article. - fchd (talk) 07:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --ClubOranjeTalk 10:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Totally unecessary... nowt more to be said. Bettia (rawr!) 14:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 15:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Go ahead and delete the article, judging by the comments above it's unanimous. Boddefan2009 (talk) 18:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.