- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ganglands
- Ganglands (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable film still in production. From the article: "Although its unknown if the film will be released nationally, even internationally, just yet" Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. This is a disputed PROD, no reason given for disputing. Mattinbgn\talk 08:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 08:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This movie contains a fair amount of stars with Wikipedia articles of their own. Article also needs formatting and more information. – Jerryteps 08:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable amateur film that does not appear to satisfy WP:MOVIE criteria. References provided all appear to be self-written. --DAJF (talk) 09:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —DAJF (talk) 09:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - a 17yr old actor who makes short films. Good luck to him but, until it's successful noone writes about the film and neither should we - Peripitus (Talk) 09:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per "Future films, incomplete films, and undistributed films" guidelines at WP:MOVIE. --Stormie (talk) 10:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, can't find anything on IMDB except for a 2007 film of the same name (with a different cast obviously). And that such a busy American actor like Brett Cullen (Goodwin from Lost) should appear in a minor scene in an Australian independent film sounds slightly hoaxish to me; neither IMDb nor his official site mention Ganglands at all. – sgeureka t•c 12:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the lack of notability; no problem with recreation later if there is significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 13:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete through lack of notability. Steve T • C 13:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, wishful thinking. I've also slapped db-person tags on several of the supposed 17 and 18 year old actors in this film, although one has the claim of having appeared in 11 episodes of Neighbours, so I've only removed Gangland from his credits. Corvus cornixtalk 21:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- with a budget of a mere AUD$1000 and a handful of unknown actors, I suspect this is just some amateur filemaker looking for exposure on their uncompleted film. - Longhair\talk 01:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I was not able to find enough reliable sources to convince me that this project is not a hoax. Seems to fail the verifiability criterion. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete Good exposure for the makers until this afd ends... Five Years 18:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball fight!. Oh, and can I suggest that when this is deleted, the article is recreated as a redirect to organized crime or similar? Steve T • C 18:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.