- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 02:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FK Borac Ostružnica
- FK Borac Ostružnica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. No evidence that this club has participated in the national cup, therefore failing WP:FOOTYN; also fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 12:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. They played in the qualifying stages of the Serbian Cup in 2010–11 according to RSSSF. The team that plays at my old school has a better ground than this team, judging from the external link, and they play at the 12th level in England. So if they moved to Serbia they would be deemed notable? Hmm. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 03:37, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Good find, but I'm still not convinced of the club's notability. Could be a time to ignore the rules and apply some common sense? GiantSnowman 13:37, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. There are many more of them though and you know that we'll be accused of bias if we systematically nominate them all. The inclusion criteria of cup notability needs to be thoroughly discussed. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 21:53, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as the article meets the current notability criteria, with no prejudice against another AfD if wider discussion concludes that such clubs are not notable. J Mo 101 (talk) 12:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.