- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 12:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
F.C. Japan
- F.C. Japan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is not notable enough, does not cite any references, and the external links mentioned in the article are unrelated or insufficient as sources. CarlosPatiño (talk) 19:01, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not meeting general notability guidelines and (as a minor, local amateur team) not being presumed notable as a football club. Could redirect to Cosmopolitan Soccer League. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 21:07, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 19:40, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of notability. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 09:08, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or redirect. Suriel has it right, there is nothing WP:RS out there to support notability. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 18:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.