- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Eric Villency
- Eric Villency (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Much of the content dates back to the very first edit, which is suspiciously promotional in tone. Ori Livneh (talk) 05:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- The lack of an article for Villency Design Group is pretty damning, in my opinion. It's very rare for a person to be notable as chief executive officer of a company that itself has not been deemed notable. --MZMcBride (talk) 17:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Passes GNG as the subject of multiple pieces of coverage independently published and of presumed reliability. When Inc. magazine is seeking his fashion opinions and the New York Times is covering his marriage as a social event, dude is notable. Carrite (talk) 15:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - the sources aren't convincing. Some of them are written by him. - TheMagnificentist 10:13, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.