- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. A bit of a WP:SOFTDELETE given the low input but given the prior deletion discussion and deletion review it's advisable that new and substantial sources be provided when asking for restoration. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:11, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
DeskAway
AfDs for this article:
- DeskAway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability: significant RS coverage cannot be found; advertorial content. The article was nominated for deletion in 2009 and was deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:13, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane2007 talk 02:18, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane2007 talk 02:18, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:35, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:35, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: A WP:SPA article on a topic which had previously been deleted at AfD (also restored to the original user account), with the decision confirmed at a deletion review of a proposed replacement version. The given references are predominantly in the period 2008-10. Of those later than the deletion review, the name-check in a list in the Times of India article on start-ups is not evidence of notability, any mention in "The SaaS Edge" is primary (author is co-founder), and the inclusion in the Google new Apps blog is a routine announcement. In these and my own searches I am seeing nothing which goes beyond evidence of existence and could demonstrate notability and overturn the previously AfD/DR decision. AllyD (talk) 07:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.