- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 21:59, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dave Angel, Eco-Warrior
- Dave Angel, Eco-Warrior (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A Merge to The Fast Show would be more appropriate than deletion, I think.--Michig (talk) 19:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 21:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 21:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There are a fair number of news stories on the character [1], [2] are fairly representative. The book Group Identities on French and British Television makes brief mention of the character. The character is commonly used to describe the actor ([3] for example) and is also commonly used in the context of real "eco-warriors" [4] for example. The sources aren't great, but aren't horrible and the character appears iconic in the UK. Hobit (talk) 00:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge anything cited to third-party sources to The Fast Show. In other words, delete. Stifle (talk) 15:52, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - News stories provided as references are very small and barely mention the character. All of the show character's articles should probably be pared down and merged. - Richfife (talk) 20:03, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.